4 ms·

2014... after that they did go to London to interview him and did DNA testing and found nothing too.

by gcb0 7y ago

danso 7y ago
This is where you do us the courtesy of citing a source. edit: I'll do some of the work for you: In March 2015, news reports said that Swedish prosecutors were negotiating a deal to question Assange in London, and that the visit could include taking a DNA sample [0]. The visit happened in Nov. 2016, though the only articles I've seen do not conclusively say whether Assange agreed to give a DNA sample [1]. In any case, prosecutors getting a DNA sample from him does not have anything to do with whether the prosecutors have their own evidence from their investigation, nevermind your baseless charge of "Sweden didn't produce a single evidence of the crime." It's possible you're conflating Assange's 2016 London interview and potential DNA test with the 2012 reports that, according to Assange's lawyers, Swedish police did not find conclusive evidence of Assange's DNA on a torn condom -- although they did find DNA believed to be Assange's on a condom from a second accuser [2]. In any case, these reports happened in 2012; 2 years later, a Swedish judge apparently considered the same evidence and decided it was enough to uphold the arrest warrant [3]. So unless you care to share the source of your information, it looks like you've either confused your timestamps about the events, or are just making things up. [0] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/wikileaks-founder-assange-could-face-rape-questioning-london-n322766 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/wikileaks-founder-assange... [1] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/14/julian-assange-to-face-swedish-prosecutors-over-accusation https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/14/julian-assange... [2] https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom--report-20120916-260vs.html https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom--... [3] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/16/julian-assange-swedish-judge-rules-arrest-warrant-live https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/16/julian-assange...

2014... after that they did go to London to interview him and did DNA testing and found nothing too.

by gcb0 7y ago

2014... after that they did go to London to interview him and did DNA testing and found nothing too.

This is where you do us the courtesy of citing a source. edit: I'll do some of the work for you: In March 2015, news reports said that Swedish prosecutors were negotiating a deal to question Assange in London, and that the visit could include taking a DNA sample [0]. The visit happened in Nov. 2016, though the only articles I've seen do not conclusively say whether Assange agreed to give a DNA sample [1]. In any case, prosecutors getting a DNA sample from him does not have anything to do with whether the prosecutors have their own evidence from their investigation, nevermind your baseless charge of "Sweden didn't produce a single evidence of the crime." It's possible you're conflating Assange's 2016 London interview and potential DNA test with the 2012 reports that, according to Assange's lawyers, Swedish police did not find conclusive evidence of Assange's DNA on a torn condom -- although they did find DNA believed to be Assange's on a condom from a second accuser [2]. In any case, these reports happened in 2012; 2 years later, a Swedish judge apparently considered the same evidence and decided it was enough to uphold the arrest warrant [3]. So unless you care to share the source of your information, it looks like you've either confused your timestamps about the events, or are just making things up. [0] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/wikileaks-founder-assange-could-face-rape-questioning-london-n322766 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/wikileaks-founder-assange... [1] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/14/julian-assange-to-face-swedish-prosecutors-over-accusation https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/nov/14/julian-assange... [2] https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom--report-20120916-260vs.html https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom--... [3] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/16/julian-assange-swedish-judge-rules-arrest-warrant-live https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/16/julian-assange...