gazillionaire

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   Socialism is not a definition on Wikipedia. Also, is this a joke: "A non-market socialist system eliminates the inefficiencies and crises traditionally associated with capital accumulation and the profit system in capitalism." - t
2. 2.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   The argument "we already have all those rules" is not really useful. Apparently the treatment of the Facebook Content Moderators is also legal. So by your logic, it is OK, because we already have those rules. I don't know why
3. 3.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   Line workers can switch jobs if they are unhappy with the conditions. If everybody would do that, companies would be forced to make those jobs more attractive to retain and compete for workers.
4. 4.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   Maddening that they don't manage to present clear data points - deliberately, or because they don't know any better? Like what is the point of comparing flu deaths between January and August with Covif219 deaths in the same time p
5. 5.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   What's wrong with "love it or leave it"? That's choice and responsibility. Jobs are created by people. If you think jobs should be different, create such jobs. Why should anybody else be obliged to do it for you?
6. 6.▲
   by gazillionaire 6y ago

   Socialism doesn't give you jobs to choose from, it assigns you a job. That you are supposed to do for the common good, no personal gains allowed.