garyscary

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by garyscary 7y ago

   No problem, just thought it was interesting to compare what could have happened compared to what you proposed.
2. 2.▲
   by garyscary 7y ago

   Based on the simulations they ran according to historical data, they concluded that the Germans would have thought they had air supremancy even if that was impossible, even with the Germans continuing to bomb RAF bases long after they swit
3. 3.▲
   by garyscary 7y ago

   Could you explain in what quantifiable quality German tanks were the best-in-class. You mention performance but German tanks were not the best for mileage, ease of repair or survivability, which make up the holy trinity of tanks: firepower,
4. 4.▲
   by garyscary 7y ago

   Check out this actual war game they conducted in 1974 where they concluded that the invasion would have been a resounding failure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea_Lion_(wargame)
5. 5.▲
   by garyscary 7y ago

   Well, going by superiority in tech is putting it very simply. The different sides had very different logistical/tactical concerns. For example, the SCR-536, which was a man portable radio was a bigger technical feat than any tank or ba
6. 6.▲
   by garyscary 8y ago

   Guess we’re lucky not to have rats here in Alberta.
7. 7.▲
   by garyscary 8y ago

   I guess we’re lucky in Alberta to not have rats