Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ganarajpr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
The problem with javascript and the tooling related to it isnt something to do with the existence of great tools. Ofcourse, tools that are pretty mature and really good, as found for other languages dont exist for javascript ( like the tool
92.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
If you try to reinvent the wheel, you will get another wheel. I think what Bret is talking about there is wondering about if we could create airplanes and spaceships perhaps!
93.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
So what is ractive.js's equivalent of $scope.$apply ? $scope.$apply is used for this specific purpose, to notify angular of any external changes.
94.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Can some of the clojure and clojurescript gurus take some time to write beginner friendly, hand holding tutorials? I mean, I can see the power of these technologies but the very thought of climbing a learning curve AS WELL AS a getting star
95.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
A set of other tools that also do the same thing : http://www.webflow.com/ https://jetstrap.com/ http://www.divshot.com/ http://html.adobe.com/edge/reflow/ https
96.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
That is probably the wrong way to think about it. Its like saying "Well, we shouldnt be using motor cars because thats puts Horse carriages out of business". Or something to that effect. We are moving towards a world where js is u
97.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
More referral links :) If the other one is already exhausted.. https://www.nitrous.io/join/AqqPlW923Js
98.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Sorry.. Dint get why its called "Next-Generation" ?
99.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Not really true. They are still building tools that were like other older tools ( but with more complexity ). As far as I can tell nobody ( nobody I know) is thinking "How can I make this easy ? " Most of the tools these days are build arou
100.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
This might just tempt me ( a non css-y person ) to switch over from bootstrap to this while prototyping or otherwise. It makes things extremely modular which is what makes sense to a programmer like me.
101.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Am I the only one asking the right question? This video is not a just-for-fun video. It is a cry from the animators of this world that they want better tools. We, as tool builders, programmers, need to listen to this. There is a problem her
102.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
I think Bootstrap IS important. Why? Because it improved the look of the average website. It made creating MVP's easier while not compromising on the look and feel much. Ofcourse, when a lot of sites use Bootstrap, they start to look the s
103.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Angular renders the most used parts of JQuery useless, if you use Angular the "right" way. If we do consider it, two of the most used parts of JQuery are $.ajax and querying the DOM. Because angular already provides you $http and $resource
104.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
This is not the same as Enyo. Probably not even close. Agreeably they are both Component Frameworks but the similarity ends there. Enyo's component description is in Javascript. Polymers is in HTML. And that is what sets them apart.
105.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
The point of an app store is to make money for the app store owner. The owner charges "rent" to put your app in its store. The rent is a cut of your earnings. So, given this fact - do you think putting Google Play on its Tizen would benefit
106.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
How many times on your computer have you been targeted by a hacker who showed you shock porn ? If the answer is nil, why do you think it will happen on your glass?
107.
▲
KnockoutJS vs AngularJS
(nebithi.com)
2 points
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Just FYI.. This is built with AngularJS. One of the coolest product built with it too.
109.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
I think they dont.. ( atleast I dont!! ) Anyway see this article http://programming.oreilly.com/2013/04/stop-standardizing-ht...
110.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
I soooo wish there was a firefly kickstarter!!!
111.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
Agreed. Any utility functions should go into a different service. Using $rootScope feels like a hack.
112.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
This reminds me of a kid, lying flat in the middle of a super market, revolting with his parents because they didn't buy a toy he liked..
113.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
To Microsoft : Please fix your IE debacle ( somehow!!).. Its affecting your other products.. Its reputation is becoming infectious.
114.
▲
by
ganarajpr
13y ago
love the title of the article.. Very creative.
115.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
OMG dint know that... Thank you sooo freaking much!!!
116.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
Could you define the "novel and interesting parts"? Perhaps examples of what they are ? If you are fighting with Angular there is probably a reason. You probably did not read this : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14994391/how-do-i-thin
117.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
Community wise, if you give a 5 to Backbone and 4 each to Angular and Ember - I would be somewhat ok with that.. But still a 3 to CanJS is a bit far-fetched... CanJS github has ~500+ stars. 25 questions on SO. In comparison Github stars: B
118.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
I think the article is fine. The author states that he is comparing the frameworks he has USED. Not all MV* frameworks. About the author favoring CanJS, I think you may be right.
119.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
Sorry, you might be the author of Backbone, but this is one aspect that you might have gotten wrong. If you had considered it, there would have been more meat in Backbone. Following your logic, we should all be writing code in assembler or
120.
▲
by
ganarajpr
14y ago
Its already clear from the article that they did not actually do an objective study of the different frameworks. They were already heavily biased towards rails and given that batmanjs is something that is very close ( convention over config
More ›