ganarajpr

17 ms·

121.
Angular Directives - The computer science of javascript(adobe.com)
5 points by ganarajpr 14y ago|0 comments
122.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Did you actually read what I wrote? I do agree I missed writing "classical" OOP in there, but I guess I assume wrong when I think that people can fill in the blanks. Here is the jist of what I mentioned earlier - "Most frameworks provide ab
123.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Regarding AngularJS, please use it only if you are new javascript and prefer learning Angular Javascript (which is not javascript by the way) :) I am not sure you "know" javascript. If you are saying that there is an Angular version
124.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
source for this please?
125.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Actually ng-change is very much same as a $watch.. Here is the relevant source from Angular.. var ngChangeDirective = valueFn({ require: 'ngModel', link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) { ctrl.$viewChangeListeners.pus
126.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
When I went ahead and had a look at one of the examples of hexagonal.js, Misko Hevery's answer in quora http://www.quora.com/Ember-js/Which-one-of-angular-js-and-em... immediately came to my mind. He notes that there are 3 ways to bind da
127.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
You are partially right... partially wrong.. You lose control for it only when you use ng-repeat.. you could alternately write your own repeat directive that does animations for adding or removing.. If your are not yet in a state to write
128.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
I think its twitter more than facebook.. Facebook is oriented towards connecting friends.. while twitter is oriented towards people with similiar interests..
129.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
I am going to attempt to answer you : Here are the list of points from the FAQ : The focus is on supplying you with helpful methods to manipulate and query your data, not on HTML widgets ( angular ) or reinventing the JavaScript object mo
130.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
How about running it as a plugin or something for a suite of functional specs for the website ( if it has one! ). Functional spec's by definition should run all the paths that a user can take, so it should give a pretty good idea of the cs
131.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Get jashkenas or the people behind Backbone to write a data-binding plugin.. I guess, I will consider BB for data-binding then. I have tried most of the data-binding plugins in backbone.. They all fall short one way or the other. Stickit do
132.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Oh sorry, I was under the assumption that you were using CSS selectors in JS not in CSS.. If its in CSS, then it should be fine. If you are using CSS selectors in JS in an angular app.. then that seems like a smell.
133.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Could you perhaps answer the first part of his question as well? That was probably the main part that you missed out. Isnt mustache doing the same? Why do you really care about the rendered HTML ( after mustache's spits out html ) being cle
134.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Can you please make any other sane argument other than "it clutters my markup"? You are holding the markup to a standard which seems like there is someone out there handing out "The best clean and clutter free markup" award. End of the day
135.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Regarding Angular : You can use the data-ng-* way of adding the ng- attributes. Since data-ng- is HTML5 compliant most major server side templating systems should let it pass through. If you are using custom elements, then you have to figu
136.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
You are right about the first situation. Currently doing animations with Angular is not a trivial task. This is mostly because of its "No DOM manipulation in Controllers clause". If you break that clause, having a repeat with animations is
137.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
I had a look at your todo-app. I did not get 100% of what you are doing but your project looks ambitious ( which I think is good! )to say the least. One of the problems with ambitious projects is that getting adoption is kind of hard becaus
138.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Your project seems interesting. Until you create a sample application that shows off the good things about your framework, I cant comment much. Perhaps an article from you or someone else involved in the framework would be a good starting p
139.
Backbone and Angular: Demystifying the myth(nebithi.com)
10 points by ganarajpr 14y ago|4 comments
140.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Assuming that all frameworks are leaky and writing from scratch is almost always a waste of time. Even if something is leaky and you spend a week trying to fix it, it will probably still be faster to build using those abstractions than to b
141.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Following the same argument, you should probably have started with assembler - because, then you would have gained a significant amount of knowledge about the system ( at such a deep level ). The point of programming is about creating abstr
142.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
OMG!!! Generating html with javascript is just soo stupid. It has the same problem as writing javascript in html ( I think html in js is even worse! ). The way you separate out logic from presentation in html ( proponents of unobtrusive js?
143.
by ganarajpr 14y ago
Since GA is non-deterministic, you will never know how long / for how many iterations ( generations) to run the GA for. If one could get a pretty good compression in around 200-500 generations, then perhaps it would be a good solution.
144.
AngularJS vs EmberJS(nebithi.com)
8 points by ganarajpr 14y ago|0 comments