gaigalas

19 ms·

331.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
I don't understand why 4o gets so much heat. I mean, it's definitely unsafe. But so is the 5 series.
332.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
> maybe you have examples of historical breakthroughs in AI Alignment OpenAI confessions is a good example of largely non-mathematical insight: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08093 I don't know, I think it's g
333.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Why do you think a breakthrough in AI Alignment should require doing math? Many alignment problems are solved not by math formulas, but by insights into how to better prepare training data and validation steps.
334.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Being honest is actual a moral flex, she's putting herself above any competitor that engages with deceitful marketing strategies.
335.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
> You shipped it, it's _your_ mistake now. If it's bad: Human mistake. If it's good: It's a great tool. People are going to love that!
336.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/issues/35#issuecomment-... The idea of "fuck it, let's do Windows everywhere" was introduced by Justine Tunney as an April Fools Joke in the Cosmopolitan re
337.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
That's fascinating! What compels you to not value that phenomena?
338.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
I like the fact that it forgets. Each time an LLM looks at my project, it's like a newcomer has arrived. If it keeps repeating mistakes, it's because my project sucks. It's an unique opportunity. You can have lots of repeated
339.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
If I see a human copying me, I know for a fact at least one person was impacted by what I do. Even if that person never acknowledges me publicly, or forgets I even exist, I know for a fact that what I did meant something. Scrapers gobble ev
340.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Don't worry, sometimes you're not the direct cause of the tarpit. Most people fall into these unknowingly.
341.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
If you don't want AIs to train on it you should not open source it.
342.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
> Clearly some powerful alien tool was handed around except it comes with no manual Using tools before their manual exists is the oldest human trick, not the newest.
343.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Seems like you're trying to steer the conversation towards merits of consciousness. A well known and classic conversational tarpit. Fascinating topic. However, my argument works for compartimentalized discussions as well. Conscious or
344.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
If I were some major contributor to the software world, I would not want a cheque from some AI company. (by the way, I love the idea of AI! Just don't like what they did with it)
345.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
You need talented people to turn bad publicity into good publicity. It doesn't come for free. You can lose a lot with a bad rep. Those talented people that work on public relations would very much prefer working with base good publicit
346.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
You missed a spot: > hopefully saying something good about
347.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Isn't it obvious? It's not a thank-you letter. It's preying on creators who feel their contributions are not recognized enough. Out of all letters, at least some of the contributors will feel good about it, and share it on
348.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
I know what you mean! I've lived through those myself. However, for a beginner, specially if said beginner never worked in a larger company with resources to produce an internal framework, they might think you're referring to Flas
349.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
My experience in the real world is that the majority of people choose the largest "macro" framework available and go with that. It's what happens most often. The "micro framework" phase happens when that "macro
350.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Can you elaborate on what is the reasoning here?
351.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
> Introduce new concepts that doesn't exist in the original stack That is also true for "macro" frameworks. > Wraps around the company/org-shared tech stack or framework That is often also true for "macro&quot
352.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
Anthony Jackson interview from 1992: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS-xDsic84Q Please listen to it. > The machines are here. > We have to live with that. Things are different. > Hopefully, if one has done his hom
353.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
When we talk about code, you think it's about code, but it's communication _about solving problems_ which happens to use code as a language. If you don't understand that language, code becomes a mystery, and you don't un
354.
Um.sh – Executable alternative standard to SKILLS for humans and machines(gist.github.com)
2 points by gaigalas 10mo ago|1 comments
355.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
This is a reusable, re-distributable simplified version of my local setup. It is a self-describing dispatching framework. Docs, code, style all in one single file. You don't like AI? Cool, you can use it as a framework for writing gene
356.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
I am currently watching closely both yours, pnut.sh (already mentioned in the thread) and https://github.com/cosinusoidally experiments. I think they all have something good to contribute. These first steps interest me very
357.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
> can it run in WebAssembly? You can safely assume so. Bellard is the creator of jslinux. The news here would be if it _didn't_. > What's the difference to regular JavaScript? It's in the project's README! > Is
358.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
If I could save only one of my books from destruction, it would be that one.
359.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
The thing about Mes is that it does riscv64 too. I don't know the current state of the support, but there is something there. There are still many pieces of riscv64 missing in the whole thing (an equivalent to Fiwix being the most chal
360.
by gaigalas 10mo ago
This whole "clever code" has become a social thing. It's one of the things people say when they don't like some piece of code, but they also can't justify it with a more in-depth explanation on why the cleverness is

More ›