gaiaseyes

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gaiaseyes 13y ago

   You've hit the nail on the head. The journal's impact factor would be pitifully low. But you're quite correct that having the information available would save a great deal of time and money (and blood, sweat, tears, grief and
2. 2.▲
   by gaiaseyes 13y ago

   I think, by your comment, you are not a scientist. As a scientist, there is absolutely nothing more despicable than intentionally and continuously publishing fraudulent data. This is the highest ethical standard in our field. Falsifying dat
3. 3.▲
   by gaiaseyes 13y ago

   You've made a good point, and one that often arises in research. I've just finished my PhD in microbiology over the summer and am in a post-doc now. I cannot tell you the number of experiments I've done that yielded negative