gadf

15 ms·

61.
by gadf 5y ago
Could microplastics, aerosolized in seawater be playing a role in this? I saw something that most of the non-smoking related lung cancers are in coastal regions
62.
by gadf 5y ago
Sorry for you to hear that :(
63.
by gadf 5y ago
Maybe you just haven't done anything dangerous enough to warrant that sort of attention so you can have the luxury of that unchallenged opinion.
64.
by gadf 5y ago
I guess you think that it's okay for the community to be bad in some way but it's not okay for researchers because science ethics should be higher than community ethics. It's an interesting perspective I guess it comes from t
65.
by gadf 5y ago
Clearly Boni wanted him gone in order to take his spot, so under the cover of trust, discretion and friendship he enticed him to share about his microdosing adventures including how he had taken it before meetings. Boni secretly got it on r
66.
by gadf 5y ago
Lambda School Agrees To Stop Beating Its Wife CA Gov Site Denies Making Deceptive Headline Journalists Covering CA Gov's Headline Deception Deny Using Clickbait HN Commentariat Denies Having Insubstantial Discussion About Title
67.
by gadf 5y ago
Thanks for repluing. I'll trie to make sense of what you're saying and maybe reply you loiter. Have good doi :)
68.
by gadf 5y ago
So it's bad for the researchers to deliberately deceive the community because a rule says patches must be good faith but it's not bad for the community to be abusive because there's no rule that says it shouldn't? so the
69.
by gadf 5y ago
But if I choose to interact with the community, does my choice to present myself, justify any and all abusive actions they may volley at me? Oof coarse not. The point would ordinarily be a good one, but I think you've misused it. The L
70.
by gadf 5y ago
It's actually a positive. The commoditization and proliferation of content-free and evidence-free complaints against people will lead inexorably to the distrust of all such things, leading to a birth of a future "evidenced-based&q
71.
by gadf 5y ago
Or David Galed-himself to "prove" that the banks hire assassins when someone speaks against them...
72.
by gadf 5y ago
Girls will be girls... We don't know if it's a boy or a girl. Haha, well you're certainly passionate about this.
73.
by gadf 5y ago
I'm sorry but this is consolations for the losers. This will sound really harsh and I'm not directing it at you (except where I say "you") but at this kind of tall tale I see a lot. If they (in the above story) were so s
74.
by gadf 5y ago
Wow. Looking to hate on the first thing because they're successful.. confirm your twisted worldview that success is robbery to make your feel better how you haven't made it. Nice try...
75.
by gadf 5y ago
Take aspirin daily forever, if your stomach hurts, stop. Start again.
76.
by gadf 5y ago
Meta commentary, part 1: By exposing her soft belly and saying "stab me with your best shot," OP has revealed the soft underbelly darkside of HN. By lowering themself in front of HN, they've made themselves a target for every
77.
by gadf 6y ago
So, on balance, it all evens out. Anti China racism, causality delusion to the detriment of the West, all looks to be in order. Carry on Humans responding to a crisis by blaming each other. Most predictable thing ever. HN commentariat talki
78.
by gadf 6y ago
So even if what we're saying if not true, we're still right. collateral racism bedamned. You're not going to take our legitimized bias say from us, so stahp trying!
79.
by gadf 6y ago
I think a man in his position, with the contracts, and connections and companies he has, is probably not allowed to hold certain opinions, such as being publicly bullish on China, in the current "climate". It's kind of sad to
80.
by gadf 6y ago
This is a little embarrassing to read the start of this with acute China-hawk Pompeo needling Peter to dunk on China. It's like they've wheeled him out to denounce so he can silence any doubts about his loyalties. I wonder what tr
81.
by gadf 6y ago
I'm not sure that's exclusive with what I'm proposing but I definitely think that will happen and is happening even now. I'd be kind of okay with that world where the incentive to cure people is that we can extract more
82.
by gadf 6y ago
I suppose you're right. But I don't necessarily think that's evidence against what I'm saying in fact I think it speaks to what I'm saying which is that curing is inherently not that profitable so there's an in
83.
by gadf 6y ago
now I think you're being too naive. In that case they purchase employees corporation with their evil scheme by providing them with the cure of course.
84.
by gadf 6y ago
I like that idea that's really good that is a good counter argument thank you.
85.
by gadf 6y ago
I'd say pretty clearly if you hold back a cure for breast cancer because you can't get investors to put in 10 billion dollars when you're going to make one billion on it but long-term treatments for breast cancer at various s
86.
by gadf 6y ago
That's a really good point about lasik. Great example thank you. But at the same time I guess it cuts both ways because lasik exists. but what I'm specially worried about is that cures might be designed to not be perfect so that m
87.
by gadf 6y ago
The first points are really good one. But the second point lost me because I think you can see there's actually a lot of value to be tapped in technology say by keeping software kind of shit for a long time. You end up with lots of con
88.
by gadf 6y ago
I'm not an economist I kind of wish I was in this debate but I think the point you make is a hard one to refute.
89.
by gadf 6y ago
the power of that phrase conspiracy theory is amazing. As soon as I read it I started to doubt my conclusions and I was very open to what you were saying. I think because of its power such a phrase must be regarded with suspicion. I don&#x2
90.
by gadf 6y ago
Thank you for this analysis I believe it's making my case more clear.

More ›