g-b-r

25 ms·

721.
by g-b-r 2y ago
If the people from 10.000 wanted me to write useless digits for 8 thousand years, I'd leave them a bad planet just out of spite xD
722.
by g-b-r 2y ago
> It was up to the author to parse the sentence in advance of posting it. And competent writers don't invite such obvious double meanings -- they undermine the value of the essay. The author? She can't do it for the reader; to
723.
by g-b-r 2y ago
As a sidenote, I hate it, can someone explain where does it come from?
724.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Rotfl, ok, I understood what's going on xD
725.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Kind of weird that there's all this support for Evangelicals on an Hacker News discussion.
726.
by g-b-r 2y ago
> > The fifth of six children fathered by Rev. Walter Green, God has always been at the forefront of Hobby Lobby patriarch David Green’s life. > Imagine having a family of ordinary children, plus God. And yes, the remainder of the
727.
by g-b-r 2y ago
> I'm first interested in the more straightforward situation of the people who worked on a less-lethal weapon system, which they might've anticipated would be used in exactly this way. What do they think about that? It seems ea
728.
by g-b-r 2y ago
None, but that issue has no mention of what you said in the other message (" Only Messages was allowed to support it. At the time it was written, for example, it was years after the Signal developers had asked for basic RCS support (20
729.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Did you read that issue? It's Moxie that refused to support it
730.
by g-b-r 2y ago
They'll demand half of Google's rare earths deposits
731.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Potentially indeed, that's why I said "risky". It - depends on how the clients want to implement it (it's not unthinkable that some might choose a "more effective" remote scanning) - it makes it a lot harder to
732.
by g-b-r 2y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43368471
733.
by g-b-r 2y ago
That text seems more a reflection of the fact that only Messages supported it, when the document was written If they seriously wanted random third parties to implement it, anyhow, they'd have published a specification, not an "ove
734.
by g-b-r 2y ago
This is a risky clause: > R5-32-5 An RCS client having E2EE enabled shall implement techniques to detect suspicious messages or conversations.
735.
by g-b-r 2y ago
If say he sent money to hamas he might be called Netanyahu, by the way...
736.
by g-b-r 2y ago
AIPAC, Christian zionism, misconceptions and lack of knowledge about Israel, and very strong Israeli lobbying in general
737.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Who downvoted this?
738.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Trump didn't want to talk to him, by going he had a good chance to move things I know very little of military stuff, but no one can rely on the US anymore, whether they want it or not. Now I can't access the article where I read i
739.
by g-b-r 2y ago
He was looking for support, and what he got was an offer to pillage his country. He would have been his country's disgrace if he just signed that "deal" as it stood, and Trump would have boasted about it for years, of how s
740.
by g-b-r 2y ago
The same supreme court gave him complete immunity
741.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Uhm yeah everyone is authoritarian so let's embrace dictators right? :facepalm:
742.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Since no one said it yet, in case you don't already know tmux and you find it complex, zellij is a lot easier to learn
743.
by g-b-r 2y ago
I imagine what they really mean is that there's something that can't be built by us (and maybe that can't even be "plugged into" by things we build), that we can't build anything that carries out the same funct
744.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Let's hope that someone learned real politik is actually blind, short-term politik.
745.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Most of my personalizations are through aliases, but another no-brainer is [interactive] singleKey = true and I'd recommend are [gc] reflogExpire = never reflogExpireUnreachable = 150 (or another high number)
746.
by g-b-r 2y ago
I use tags for all kinds of personal, often temporary, things, so, yeah, no followTags
747.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Wet automatons can well be more convenient than real robots, for many jobs
748.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Or protect your workers, keep them safe....
749.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Come on it's not about all new technologies, there are extremely reasonable concerns with this specific technology (or at least its application).
750.
by g-b-r 2y ago
Again, if the president can have a strong influence on them, they're not independent, however they might get called

More ›