Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fynyky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
fynyky
4mo ago
The big difference is that you don't have to use all of React! Plus with the ability to run child functions, you can inject arbitrary logic inline without having to break the declarative structure.
2.
▲
Show HN: Elemental – simple front ends in plain JavaScript
(github.com)
6 points
by
fynyky
4mo ago
|
3 comments
3.
▲
by
fynyky
4mo ago
This is a personal library I’ve been using for a while. I really don’t like how much frontend frameworks require you to invest in them. You have to learn funky domain specific languages, and magic render lifecycles just to debug anything. I
4.
▲
Reactor.js – Simple reactive programming without a framework
(github.com)
2 points
by
fynyky
8y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
fynyky
9y ago
Works fine with iOS 11 and above it seems. Older versions of iOS just died when trying any webrtc stuff. Takes a little bit of fiddling with media constraints but nothing too hard
6.
▲
by
fynyky
9y ago
Pretty simple actually. Just running express with socket.io on heroku. Using redis to enable socket.io cross-server messaging. Client side the core engine is built on webrtc. Not using any major client side frameworks.
7.
▲
by
fynyky
9y ago
Yeah it's a personal project I've been working on for a while. All data is peer-to-peer and encrypted so there's no data for servers to store. Haven't figured out how to write a proper privacy policy yet
8.
▲
by
fynyky
9y ago
This is a side project I've been working on for a while. Basically I got tired of the whole "do you have skype?", "Are you ready to call?", "Okay calling now" dance every time you had to do a video call wi
9.
▲
Show HN: Chatlet – Simple Video Chat
(chatlet.com)
7 points
by
fynyky
9y ago
|
9 comments
10.
▲
by
fynyky
13y ago
Check out this fiddle =) http://jsfiddle.net/TjMgh/4/
11.
▲
by
fynyky
13y ago
One difference is that there is no need to explicitly subscribe to signals. For general functions, knockout requires manually declaring "myViewModel.property.subscribe(...)" for each model you need to subscribe to. In contrast, Reactor's ob
12.
▲
by
fynyky
13y ago
It's "complete" as far as I've tested it. Changes are automatically pushed out without any additional work. In terms of how it compares - It's based off the same reactive programming principles but is trying to keep the additional syntax an
13.
▲
by
fynyky
13y ago
Yep. This is an attempt to do what knockout does in a simpler form with less syntax
14.
▲
Reactor.js: simple reactive programming for Javascript
(github.com)
84 points
by
fynyky
13y ago
|
31 comments
15.
▲
Just.coffee - Build sites using Coffeescript instead of HTML
(justcoffeescript.com)
2 points
by
fynyky
14y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
Show HN: Typographing - a tool for finding fonts
(typographing.com)
2 points
by
fynyky
14y ago
|
2 comments