fxwin

12 ms·

151.
by fxwin 1y ago
> People claimed all the basics were done, that we "only" needed to scale. This claim is fundamentally different from what you quoted. > But who's prepping for unlimited energy today? It's about tradoffs: It costs
152.
by fxwin 1y ago
The page only talks about adopting PQC for key agreement for SSH connections, not encryption in general so the overhead would be rather minimal here. Also from the FAQ: "Quantum computers don't exist yet, why go to all this troubl
153.
by fxwin 1y ago
Then the "Examples" section should include a "How to build a simple MCP server using this framework" section. Instead, it contains an example for an "MCP client" (however the implementation has little to do wit
154.
by fxwin 1y ago
I'll be honest i read your repository's README.md and still have no idea what this is supposed to be. The tagline sounds like it's for implementing MCP servers, but the endpoints specified further down aren't part of MC
155.
by fxwin 1y ago
If i predict that my next dice roll will be a 5 with 16% certainty and i do indeed roll a 5, was my prediction wrong?
156.
by fxwin 1y ago
I feel like the implication was fairly clear here (Or maybe not "extremely" clickbaity as far as headlines are concerned)
157.
by fxwin 1y ago
How does the paper from [0] show that Aaronson doesn't understand Grover's algorithm? What level of "understanding" are you looking for here?
158.
by fxwin 1y ago
There are people who are reluctant to ask for help with things (i know i can be), and end up wasting time trying random (non-)solutions. The standup puts these people "on the spot" and enables them to move forward within a reasona
159.
by fxwin 2y ago
I've had the same experience with writing non-code text. I often use VSCode to write markdown documents on various things and having Copilot chime in to complete my mealplan for the week with 5 different kinds of chicken wraps is a wei
160.
by fxwin 2y ago
The same arguments can be made for free trade, and i think most would agree that the world is better off with international trade than without.
161.
by fxwin 2y ago
I don't think anyone has a problem with europe being a more independent player, it becoming a necessity is what people are upset about. I'd rather have germany make massive investments in infrastructure and health reform than its
162.
by fxwin 2y ago
Is this comment AI-generated?
163.
by fxwin 2y ago
Yea i hate this trend. I can understand why one would do it for text-only blogs/articles, but for something like this? The actual product already looks really good, adjust some colors or lighting and that's perfect for a title ima
164.
by fxwin 2y ago
except you don't have time to do that in the moment, since you're busy scribbling down formulas trying to keep up
165.
by fxwin 2y ago
Seems like they're not available to non-students, but I'm happy to be proven wrong
166.
by fxwin 2y ago
> Saying "non-uniform distribution" doesn't actually purvey any insight or mathematical "truth" and reveals almost nothing about the actual distribution - other than stating that it's non-uniform (well, duh!
167.
by fxwin 2y ago
Thanks!
168.
by fxwin 2y ago
What is "fair" is a complicated question (and i'm not sure what this question has to do with my comment)
169.
by fxwin 2y ago
I haven't read the examples you mentioned, do they point toward the source of the instability being extreme inequality, or the lower (economic) classes being unable to survive in dignified conditions? (read: can we tolerate great inequ
170.
by fxwin 2y ago
> The optimal distribution is left as an open question for future research. What makes you think the optimal distribution is "more uniform" rather than less? I'm not taking sides in this question, simply pointing out that
171.
by fxwin 2y ago
That statement had nothing to do with taxes or inheritance (or any specific financial process in fact). It was simply a (admittedly rather reductive) mathematical statement, which remains true independently of the nature of the underlying g
172.
by fxwin 2y ago
In any kind of non-uniform distribution of any good, the top x % will always own a disproportionate (wrt to headcount) amount of it (In economic systems, this mathematical fact is further amplified by other factors such as financial literac
173.
by fxwin 2y ago
This just reads like a fluff piece to advertise their own products, and the conclusions in the summary are the kind of vague handwavey promises AI bros have been making for the past 3 years > Take our own experience: Neartail competes wi
174.
by fxwin 2y ago
you're not who i asked, but this is a terrible name (too broad vs. the rather precise term of pqc)
175.
by fxwin 2y ago
What would you like them to call it instead?
176.
by fxwin 2y ago
Then i wouldn't call them computers, just like i wouldn't call experiments with single quantum gates computers. But if a physics experiment utilizes quantum processes to factorize a number (even if it's only the number 21), t
177.
by fxwin 2y ago
You missed the number 15360 on p12, which is mostly what i was referring to.
178.
by fxwin 2y ago
What were they used for?
179.
by fxwin 2y ago
> Real progress in this field is very easy to measure. It's based on number of effective qbits of computation. Plenty more progress measures (decoherence, gate fidelity/error rates) to use that we have made significant progress
180.
by fxwin 2y ago
Is it really that strange when the slides themselves pretty emotionally charged?

More ›