fxwin

10 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   I don't like the title of this paper, since most people in this space probably think of language models not as producing a distribution (wrt which they are indeed invertible, which is what the paper claims) but as producing tokens (wrt
2. 122.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   actual puppet
3. 123.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   While it's less than ideal it's also a very useful (and pretty accurate) heuristic to weed out papers in an area where it is impossible to read all (or even most) of them
4. 124.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   I could agree with that, but the example on p29 (Claim 6) ends with QED, but only then the proof follows. I realize I'm nitpicking form here, but still
5. 125.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   Hah, that's pretty clever if it's true .D
6. 126.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   Seems like this should be in the paper! Thanks though
7. 127.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   could just be non-english autocorrect or keyboard layout
8. 128.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   I haven't read through the entire thing yet, but the long abstract combined with the way the acronym BDH is introduced (What does the B stand for?) along with the very "flowery" name (When neither "dragon" nor &quot
9. 129.▲
   by fxwin 1y ago

   German newspaper "Die Zeit" has a few videos where they get art/cultural critics to watch and comment on modern meme culture which i find quite entertaining. Here is the video about Skibidi Toilet: https://youtu.b
10. 130.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    Thanks, I didn't see that part!
11. 131.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    > this is about using vision-LLMs for OCR Is it? To me it sounds like they do OCR first, then extract from the result with LLM: "Cortex uses automated extraction (optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (
12. 132.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    I would assume they OCR first, then extract whatever info they need from the result using LLMs Edit: Does sound like it - "Cortex uses automated extraction (optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NLP)) to
13. 133.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    I would agree with that
14. 134.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    > held out
15. 135.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    i think this is what you're looking for: https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/alterego/publications/
16. 136.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    Same here. I've been working through some textbooks without solutions for the contained exercises, and ChatGPT has been invaluable for getting feedback on solutions and hints when I'm stuck
17. 137.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    not to anyone? really?
18. 138.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    https://i.imgur.com/cf1wOwL.png after a few minutes of running it at 240 frames per second :D
19. 139.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    you can run frameRate(x) in your browser's console to speed it up a bit - might be limited by your monitor's refresh rate though
20. 140.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    This makes no sense, the comment obviously implies that there are in fact serious orgs using twitter
21. 141.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    that's why he said it describes how runtime behaves as input size changes , not how it behaves for specific values
22. 142.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    Also known as the Combed Hedgehog Theorem (which i like a bit better)
23. 143.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    The design in the OP is still more appealing (if less practical) to me because its movements and how it plays are still fairly close to how a human would play (Precisely because of the sliding). Sort of like how we generally find it less
24. 144.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    I'm also not the biggest fan of the white-on-black style, but there is definitely precedent (at least in science-youtube-space) for explainer videos "drawn live" [1-4] [1] https://www.youtube.com/@Aleph0 [2]
25. 145.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    Ah, you are right! At least wrt the "naive" mapping of irrationals to binary representation. My gut still tells me it's bijective, but the mapping has to be a bit more involved :D
26. 146.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    > One could then wonder which irrational numbers are represented by such games. Seems like there should be a bijection there no?
27. 147.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    it doesn't get much easier than that, and the downsides are much much much less of an inconvenience than having your data breached depending on what it is.
28. 148.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    could also be just massively scaling up energy consumption with little concern for efficiency (since limitless would imply very low cost), which would probably be a bad idea for renewables, and in case of not-so-cheap energy also very expen
29. 149.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    all of which are costs that pale in comparison to having your data compromised, depending on what it is
30. 150.▲
    by fxwin 1y ago

    You might be right that we'll never have quantum computers capable of cracking conventional cryptographic methods, but I'd rather err on the side of caution in this regard considering how easy it is to switch, and how disastrous i