fxwin

10 ms·

91.
by fxwin 8mo ago
Very off-putting readme/description, and even after forcing myself to read through it, I don't know why I should use this instead of Copilot/Continue/CC. > One day I had a subtle bug: the app couldn’t load an index fi
92.
by fxwin 8mo ago
I won't share work related stuff for obvious reasons, but feel free to post an example of some LLM generated (technical) article or report of yours (I also doubt you would be able to understand the subtle differences i take issue with
93.
by fxwin 8mo ago
Believe me, I've tried. By the time i get the documentation to be the way I want it, I am no longer faster than if i had just written it myself, with a much more annoying process along the way. Models have a place (e.g. for fixing form
94.
by fxwin 8mo ago
I have tried using them, both for technical documentation (Think Readme.md) and for more expository material (Think wiki articles), and bounced off of them pretty quickly. They're too verbose and focus on the wrong things for the forme
95.
by fxwin 8mo ago
> The elephant in the room is that we’re all using AI to write but none of us wants to feel like we’re reading AI generated content. My initial reaction to the first half of this sentence was "Uhh, no?", but then i realized it&
96.
by fxwin 8mo ago
> it seems linking to a copy that claims the dataset is public domain, would be problematic copyright-wise. Would it? Sounds to me like the blame lies on the person uploading the dataset under that license, unless there is some reasonabl
97.
by fxwin 8mo ago
The licensing: If I steal something and tell you its free and yours for the taking, that feels different than a Fence (knowingly) buying stolen goods. It's obviously semantics and there should have been some better judgemend from MS, b
98.
by fxwin 8mo ago
I feel like the title is a bit misleading, unless the person who put all HP books on Kaggle as a (supposedly) CC0-licensed data set did so as a Microsoft employee. Nevertheless pretty egregious oversight (incompetence?) and something that s
99.
by fxwin 8mo ago
Despite the name, I wouldn't say it is "about" Julia sets, at least not any more than it is about any other kind of fractal
100.
by fxwin 8mo ago
1) The first 2 links in the readme are 404s 2) I feel like the very first question this project needs to answer is: "Why should i use this over the official AWS CDK?" (assuming you want other people to use this). Besides maybe som
101.
by fxwin 8mo ago
> Citing a paper to defend your position is just an appeal to authority (a fallacy that they teach you about in the same class). an appeal to authority is fallacious when the authority is unqualified for the subject at hand. Citing a pap
102.
by fxwin 9mo ago
This doesn't really seem 'generic' at all to me?
103.
by fxwin 9mo ago
true, the actual word used is less important to me than the distinction between long distance trains and regional trains, since those get conflated quite a bit in this discussion.
104.
by fxwin 9mo ago
idk what to tell you except that your personal experience does not generalize, see https://www.deutschebahn.com/de/konzern/konzernprofil/zahlen... the regional trains run by regional orgs rather than db get s
105.
by fxwin 9mo ago
thats great, but they are on time 85% of the time vs long distance trains' 62% https://www.deutschebahn.com/de/konzern/konzernprofil/zahlen... see my other comment too
106.
by fxwin 9mo ago
fyi regional trains (which the deutschlandticket is valid for) are very punctual, it is the long distance/ICE trains that are always late/broken, and you cannot ride those with thw deutschlandticket anyways.
107.
by fxwin 9mo ago
I've seen your list before and find it much easier to appreciate than the OP tbh. It is very concise, the descriptions actually describe what one might learn or struggle with and each project comes with resources to get started with (O
108.
by fxwin 9mo ago
I think you're reading a bit too much into this
109.
by fxwin 10mo ago
Mostly daily browsing of twitter and reddit, r/livestreamfail + various discord communities. Note that i have heard lots about The Game Awards, but this is a different event.
110.
by fxwin 10mo ago
I would consider myself pretty embedded in the gaming space, and I hadn't heard of the "Indie Game Awards" before yesterday. Last year's award show has <100k views on youtube, and the first article mentioning this (in
111.
by fxwin 10mo ago
as for #6: I also like to keep my intro light-hearted, but wouldn't straight up start with a joke. Let the audience settle in a bit, actually start listening to you and make them laugh "on slide 2" so to speak.
112.
by fxwin 10mo ago
the only benchmark i trust
113.
by fxwin 10mo ago
i assume 4chan would fall in the age restricted social media category
114.
by fxwin 10mo ago
i doubt 4chan will be unaffected by this
115.
by fxwin 11mo ago
> So not clear what’s the additional value over photoshop. I think photography might just not be for you (nothing wrong with that)
116.
by fxwin 11mo ago
This is the first time I'm hearing about marimo and i have to say their landing page is excellent! Immediately makes me want to try it
117.
by fxwin 11mo ago
>Meanwhile, the market is voting with its feet. Across the Fortune 1000, job postings that mention and require Jupyter knowledge are down sharply; the most recent month was deep in the red YTD. This is a joke, right?
118.
by fxwin 11mo ago
In a field with as much public visibility as this one it is naive to only think of the academic target audience, especially when choosing a title like this. As a researcher you are responsible for communicating your findings both to other e
119.
by fxwin 11mo ago
Afaict surjectivity was already a given before this paper, their contribution is the injectivity part (and thus invertibility)
120.
by fxwin 11mo ago
I agree it is technically correct, but I still think it is the research paper equivalent of clickbait (and considering enough people misunderstood this for them to issue a semi-retraction that seems reasonable)

More ›