fwklein

4 ms·

1.
by fwklein 6y ago
Two sets? There is no source that Wikileaks or Assange ever been in posession of any RNC leaks. This is disinformation.
2.
by fwklein 6y ago
That doesn't mean that they gave it to Wikileaks.
3.
by fwklein 6y ago
>Assange basically had 2 nukes, one with Clinton's name on it and one with Trump's name on it and released only the Clinton one because he had personal beef with her. What are you talking about? There's no source that Assa
4.
by fwklein 6y ago
>specifically for No, it wasn't produced specifically for RT and nowhere does it say so in your source, but RT were the only one of around 12 media outlets he offered it to buy the rights of his show, so it did premiere there. >Y
5.
by fwklein 6y ago
Emma Best published those documents and not WikiLeaks. That's what I thought was the correction.
6.
by fwklein 6y ago
RT was just one of a dozen media outlets Assange had offered his show to in 2012. His show was produced completely independent from RT. By the way, Larry King had a show on RT. Is he a russian stooge now too?
7.
by fwklein 6y ago
False. Emma Best (then Michael Best) published the information about turkish women, not WikiLeaks, and was explained by Best here https://archive.is/0VsQR
8.
by fwklein 6y ago
Why is this being downvoted? It's true and has been explained by Emma Best herself https://archive.is/0VsQR
9.
by fwklein 6y ago
And how does that prove the published contents as false?
10.
by fwklein 6y ago
WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands documents about Russia[0][1] and there's no evidence for your quoted claim made by ForeignPolicy. Where are those chatlogs? For matters about Assange you should definitely look for more indepen