fuoqi

34 ms·

331.
by fuoqi 5y ago
>Kerch straight is obviously doesn't belong to Russia Russia clearly thinks otherwise, so forcing the issue is de facto a clear provocation. >Without peace treaty in between Russia, and Ukraine, both sides are formally at war Lol
332.
by fuoqi 5y ago
Since I do not serve in the US military, I don't know for sure, but I would be really surprised if it was not the case, especially for ships and planes. I'd imagine keys are rotated on regular basis. If you think that Russia has a
333.
by fuoqi 5y ago
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Don't forget that USA military uses the encrypted P(Y)-code GPS signals, which can not be spoofed by adversary. Yes, they can be jammed, but IIRC modern militar
334.
by fuoqi 5y ago
The article implies that AIS was spoofed by the Russian side, but I find it more likely it was a case of trolling from the Ukranian side. Considering that USA and Russia have significant SIGINT capabilities in the region, finding source of
335.
by fuoqi 6y ago
It's baffling how this issue gets overblown, both in Japan and on the international stage. IIUC they will discharge water which got filtered from all radioactive isotopes except tritium. If they dump everything at once, IIRC it was cal
336.
by fuoqi 6y ago
And? How is it relevant to my point about letting European countries to decide their policy for themselves? Some countries like Poland have announced a complete discontinuation of gas import from Russia in the near future (though I suspect
337.
by fuoqi 6y ago
It's for European countries to decide from whom they want to import energy and not, isn't it? But for some reason the biggest opponent of this "reliance" is the US, not the affected European countries.
338.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Just buy your nuclear plant from Russia or China. They don't have a habit of using dependency on their high-tech export to strangle other countries (hell, Russia even supplies its nuclear fuel to Ukraine, even though it could've b
339.
by fuoqi 6y ago
>And meanwhile the likes of Nordstream2 is powering ahead. While you cry about environmental impact of burning Russian natural gas (even though Nord Stream 2 physically can not increase its export to the EU by more than 10% and probably
340.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Not a surprising reaction after the (mostly baseless) smear campaign against Sputnik V.
341.
by fuoqi 6y ago
They can easily show discrepancies by publishing everything without hiding the important information. But for some reason they don't. AFAIK they even haven't bothered to specifically indicate which parts exactly are not authentic.
342.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Is there a good way to test that an mRNA vaccine batch was stored improperly and in result has reduced efficiency? In the US supply chain may not be a problem, but if exported, in some countries it's possible that people will get near
343.
by fuoqi 6y ago
When I learnt that turbines on Texas nuclear plants stay under the open sky I was REALLY surprised. It was the reason behind the single failure, otherwise nuclear plants have weathered this crisis perfectly.
344.
by fuoqi 6y ago
You either intentionally lying or you simply don't know what are you talking about. Not only the law in question only has administrative fines, no jail time, but also it has not been even accepted yet. Also it may not even apply to sim
345.
by fuoqi 6y ago
While you can often see the claims that simple citizens can be fined under the proposed law, I could not find an official confirmation. Here is the law in question: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1086353-7 The relevant
346.
by fuoqi 6y ago
It does not look to me like Russia is struggling with exporting its reactors and building them domestically. Areva's issues look to me as purely organizational and political, not technical.
347.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Submarine, aircraft, and icebreaker reactors usually operate on military-grade fission materials. You don't want those to be exported all over the world. And a bigger reason is that they simply can not compete with bigger plants. 1 GW
348.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Lack of storage in the US is a purely political issue, not a technical one. Other countries are either successfully building such storage (Finland) or invest into fuel recycling and breeder technologies (France and Russia), which significan
349.
by fuoqi 6y ago
For those who does not know about Baikal-GVD, here is a wiki page for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baikal_Deep_Underwater_Neutrin...
350.
Launch of Baikal-GVD, one of the largest neutrino telescopes(tass.com)
1 points by fuoqi 6y ago|1 comments
351.
by fuoqi 6y ago
>I am unsure about russia. You can easily find this information online. The following picture is pretty clear: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_V_COVID-19_vaccine#/me... Also Russia is quite open about lic
352.
by fuoqi 6y ago
So in the end your position boils down to "but, but Russian aggression!!111". You were unable to refute any of the evidence of Nord Stream 2 being a commercial project first and foremost presented in my comments. When I gave you h
353.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Do you deny that EU has a limited geopolitical independence and the US exerts a strong influence over it? In my book it's called a leash. It's not so different from Russia trying to keep on the leash (with varying success) countri
354.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Yeah, I also read that the order to copy CPUs developed by the West has greatly demoralized Soviet engineers working in this field. You should learn from your competitors and build on top of that.
355.
by fuoqi 6y ago
>I suspect the same for 1986 No, in 1986 Ukraine was one the richest and most developed states in USSR (Baltic states were close) and probably quite well-developed on the European scale. But since it became independent it gradually becam
356.
by fuoqi 6y ago
No, don't trust the US propaganda used to promote its more expensive LNG and keep European countries in its leash. Both of Nord Streams are commercial projects first and foremost. IIRC they have payback period of something like from 10
357.
by fuoqi 6y ago
Well, Iran is ready to return to the previous agreement, if the US will upheld its part of the deal, without any additional talks or introducing new pre-conditions. Well, it also asks to compensate damage from the US sanctions, but I think
358.
by fuoqi 6y ago
No, it's impractical to use civilian reactors for generating materials for a nuclear bomb (I don't count "dirty" bombs as nuclear). Also usually spent fuel rods are returned to the country of production.
359.
by fuoqi 6y ago
It's unproductive to discuss such matters with a total layman who didn't bother to do even a basic research, but ok, I will play along. Let's start from the simplest thing: a Chernobyl-like event is impossible on PWR because
360.
by fuoqi 6y ago
You can get a rough measurement of the scale effect by comparing Hinkley Point C and Olkiluoto with cost of new VVER plants and time which it takes to build them.

More ›