fuf_998

5 ms·

1.
by fuf_998 5y ago
>a problem with a system Short recap: Vavilov was prosecuted for political opposition, not science. Two arguements for this: 1 - read his sentence and biography; 2 - genetics of that day was not an alternative and did not get a more suff
2.
by fuf_998 5y ago
Could you please give any info on "intentionally rigged evidence"? It is generally viewed as a problem of reproducibility in science. I am working on the topic and this is particularly important. It seems very hard to have a solid
3.
by fuf_998 5y ago
Don't you see any room for a scientific development whatsoever? Or every dogma or fork from a current dogma is accepted normally immediately as it emerges? No, rather let's look into political perspective on this, because we are t
4.
by fuf_998 5y ago
Class enemy is defined in socio-economic terms rather than purely social (which are even hard to define). Responding to your irony on "virtue" - there are certain pre-defined aspects of one's economic activity on others, for
5.
by fuf_998 5y ago
Thanks for your comment, i'm working on heterochromatin formation rn as a phd (not claiming full understanding of full epigenetic field ofc, but have some conceptual touch). >Lysenko claimed to do things well beyond anything current
6.
by fuf_998 5y ago
> as a gang of crooks who belonged somehow to some kind of international conspiracy this is exactly what is being done now, but in the opposite direction. When this should be viewed as a purely normal scientific process of debate. >Al
7.
by fuf_998 5y ago
He was. Only he was imprisoned for political reasons of being anti-bolshevik, you can even read this in the quote from his sentence in this cold-warish piece of writing in OP. This is biggest scientific myth i know - that soviets/marxi