fuckf4ce

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by fuckf4ce 5y ago

   Sure sounds like it was.
2. 2.▲
   by fuckf4ce 5y ago

   This is really more of a general purpose 2D drafting/drawing tool then a serious schematic capture tool. Tools like KiCad, Eagle, OrCAD the schematic capture entry "the drawing part" is kinda the least interesting part of the
3. 3.▲
   by fuckf4ce 5y ago

   > Yes, but shapes are not usually random. Bars, cylinders, cubes, rectangles, squares and circles are everywhere. While there are some exceptions, this is skewed in the modern industrial world. If we're making evolutionary scale arg
4. 4.▲
   by fuckf4ce 5y ago

   That still doesn't explain why those chord progressions became popular, and they far predate the late 20th century record industry, so it really isn't a very satisfying or informative explanation, even though it's not outrigh
5. 5.▲
   by fuckf4ce 5y ago

   > I don’t remember any terminals that recognised soft (inline) flow control XON/XOFF. The VT100, as well as many other contemporary terminals of the time did. Not uncommon at all. http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/p
6. 6.▲
   by fuckf4ce 6y ago

   > Running hard realtime stuff in a user space that is designed to not provide useful guarantees related to hard deadlines is brave, but ultimately somewhat foolish. So every VST/Virtual instrument in a DAW or for live performance sh