ftkudtkfkl

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ftkudtkfkl 7y ago

   You sidestepped my question though, why shouldn't they be allowed to refuse service if the toll is clearly explained? There are plenty of users who are content to receive $free services in exchange for their data, why shouldn't th
2. 2.▲
   by ftkudtkfkl 7y ago

   That's probably why they're proposing it now, there's very little risk in proposing something the average use at worst won't understand and at best will assume you had good faith in suggesting.
3. 3.▲
   by ftkudtkfkl 7y ago

   I don't see why people who opt out of paying the toll should be allowed to use the service. Nobody complains if a walled garden membership fee costs dollars why should data be different as long as you're aware up front of what is
4. 4.▲
   by ftkudtkfkl 7y ago

   Pricing a good out of someone's budget range seems entirely like removing them from the economy. What's more, your tax will hit the most economically vulnerable people in society the hardest. It's hard for me to believe peopl
5. 5.▲
   by ftkudtkfkl 7y ago

   >You might think of the US as one of the most advanced mobile markets. Advanced and quality aren't strictly synonymous. Going by the chart the article references, Canada crushes us in terms of quality but I still wouldn't want