fspeech

55 ms·

331.
by fspeech 5y ago
What do you mean "not mesh"? It is a direct quote from the commerce secretary. The quote is in the second paragraph, not just the title.
332.
U.S. needs to work with Europe to slow China's innovation rate, Raimondo says(cnbc.com)
9 points by fspeech 5y ago|11 comments
333.
by fspeech 5y ago
I don't think it necessarily works that way. You contribute illiquid llc units to the ira. The value of the contribution is up to you since it is not traded. You distribute taxable income to the ira through the llc, but no actual cash
334.
by fspeech 5y ago
On the flip side what is to stop people from setting up an llc and have their ira own the llc and shunt all their income into the llc to avoid paying any tax?
335.
by fspeech 5y ago
While trials can determine that on average there is no adverse effect it does not necessarily imply that no individual would experience any negative effect. It is possible that the negative effects experienced by some are cancelled out by p
336.
by fspeech 5y ago
Seems like cross talking to me. They were responding to the erroneous claim of "input dimensonlity" being equivalent to data. What the first poster referred to as "internal data points" may be better described as the pre
337.
by fspeech 5y ago
> The US hasn’t withdrawn any troops. Sure but I thought your point is that US should or will leave Europe. I actually don't believe that will happen. > No the US and the Anglosphere is just arming Australia. The first sub is not
338.
Bats in Laos Caves Harbor Closest Relatives to Covid-19 Virus(bloomberg.com)
7 points by fspeech 5y ago|4 comments
339.
by fspeech 5y ago
Maybe different shopping habit? I only use Amazon when I am looking for a specific (type of) product. It takes a little work but the end result is usually satisfactory. I have not done much "browsing" on Amazon as one would in a r
340.
by fspeech 5y ago
Sure. Just look at the divergence of steel price from iron ore price. I don't think steel producers are complaining. The fact is, China has been way over consuming in terms of steel. Even if they continue to depend on Australia for ir
341.
by fspeech 5y ago
They are just into realpolitik. They will switch their purchases from Australia to the US despite the strategic rivalry because it is in their interest to increase economic dependence there. They will tolerate far more transgression from th
342.
by fspeech 5y ago
> Well Europe certainly won't ally with China barring something insane happening. They've chosen the path of keeping more neutral, which lends to your first point about the stable configuration. European neutrality is all that
343.
by fspeech 5y ago
Actually it depends on the line of business. It is quite easy to get Google on the phone for Google Fi for example. As for their "free" services, you are not their real customer but the product they sell.
344.
by fspeech 5y ago
Actually Europe is super important as a force of balance. There is nothing more coveted by the Chinese than European friendship.
345.
by fspeech 5y ago
That sounds super vague. Taiwan is economically integrated with China, so are South Korea and to a lesser extent, Japan. Vietnam is dependent on Chinese imports and they share a land border. Most of Australia exports go to China. At peace t
346.
by fspeech 5y ago
I don't think that is what US political elites want but it is actually a good outcome for world peace. Russia is not moving anywhere, neither is China. Continental detente will play out over many decades, way beyond US election cycles.
347.
by fspeech 5y ago
That would make a good strategy for China if it were true: keep tension high at the SCS to draw US away from Europe; solidify relationship with Europe to develop technology and hedge against Russia.
348.
by fspeech 5y ago
Will they try to choke Australia exports to China? Joke aside still don't see a lot of value add over Singapore in terms of blockade. Unless we are talking about posturing?
349.
by fspeech 5y ago
I wasn't questioning your numbers but thanks for the reference. I think they are being purposedly vague about this. Transferring weapons grade uranium would be a real threat to the NPT.
350.
by fspeech 5y ago
Geopolitically Europe is much more important to the US than Australia ever will be. If US wants to contain China technologically European cooperation is a must. Maybe this is a sign that they are giving up on that. Or this is just a short s
351.
by fspeech 5y ago
I doubt they will use 95% uranium. [This guy]( https://theconversation.com/how-do-nuclear-powered-submarine... ) says it is about 50%. Still that is the level Iran is being sanctioned at.
352.
by fspeech 5y ago
Europe and China are much more naturally aligned in not wanting to see Russia as a dominant military power. Review the history of the cold war if reference is needed.
353.
by fspeech 5y ago
But Australia is 5000 miles away from China, only slightly less than Hawaii. Sure Australia is lower cost with vast land but don't see how that is immediate game changer.
354.
by fspeech 5y ago
These nuclear subs run on highly enriched uranium. There is serious NPT issue involved that only the US has the power to ignore.
355.
by fspeech 5y ago
I deleted my first question so that I could read on the subject a little to make sure the question wasn't a stupid one. After doing some reading I still have the same question so here it is again: Does wasm app save memory significantl
356.
by fspeech 5y ago
From family experience: Covid can definitely hit kids much harder than the common cold and they can transmit to vaccinated parents.
357.
by fspeech 5y ago
Demanding it not be so will make things permanently more expensive for everyone, not only in the monetary sense, but also in labor and material. Subsidize or ration if we must, but only temporarily and in response to a crisis.
358.
by fspeech 5y ago
This article gave some background on the reason for Arm China's existence in the first place: https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Trade-war/Beijing-s-latest-t... I wonder if the joint venture structure was contem
359.
by fspeech 5y ago
Opening argument was about robustness of immune response from exposure to the whole virus. GP implied infection was the only way to be exposed to the whole virus. I pointed out such exposure can also be achieved through inactivated virus.
360.
by fspeech 5y ago
There may be no scientific reason but it would make focusing on mRNA vaccine exclusively look like a strategic mistake. The driving factor behind the approach is the belief that the encoded domain is essential to virulence. Immune escape fr

More ›