frumper

10 ms·

91.
by frumper 2y ago
Sounds like it’d hurt poor people unless they make what you call more responsible choices. A difficult part about being poor is you often don’t have as many options. There is a lot of reasons why that turns up, but it’s there all the same
92.
by frumper 2y ago
If you're communicating all of those things, then how is it better to bother doing the splitting?
93.
by frumper 2y ago
He's been going after it for years. He just wants more teeth in a new law.
94.
by frumper 2y ago
I'd be curious to know what suburb is so awful, so I don't move there.
95.
by frumper 2y ago
A lot of people are talking about the low asset limit, but a relatively new account type gets ignored by that limit. An ABLE account. It’s not perfect and asset limits are way too low, but this type of account greatly helps people with di
96.
by frumper 2y ago
Rich kids can bring their own lights. /s
97.
by frumper 2y ago
Clinton got 95% of the donations made. That is not anywhere close to 95% of employees. She got $1.9M and there are close to 3 million federal employees.
98.
by frumper 2y ago
I apparently didn't clearly convey my message. He'd have to use some twisted logic to blame the banning of Trump from twitter on the influence from government agencies and not on Twitter. That is what the person I was responding
99.
by frumper 2y ago
Trump was the head of the government agencies at the time he was banned from Twitter. You're going to have to go down some strange rabbit holes to find the logic to work that out. It's perfectly reasonable that the people runnin
100.
by frumper 2y ago
This blending rate would just be subsidizing the have's at the expense of the have nots. It would be a market advantage to existing low rate holders going into the next 2 decades.
101.
by frumper 2y ago
It's owed to these entities at that rate for a specific amount of time. Swapping homes should then mean that the new home is on a payment timeline of whatever the remaining term is, not reset to 30 years. You'd also need to have
102.
by frumper 2y ago
That'd probably spawn a class of workers that are happy making a living off of trying out at places. Aside from that, why would someone that has a job quit their job for a company that won't commit to hiring them. The worker can
103.
by frumper 2y ago
I guess we read that completely differently. I don't see anything about an unstructured interview in his comment. He points out that he's good at interviewing by just talking to them. I read that as opposed to making them jump
104.
by frumper 2y ago
> Sure but contracts which are take-it-or-leave-it and aren't negotiations with concessions on both sides can't really be said to be willing parties.
105.
by frumper 2y ago
An F150 is more than an little similar to a Cybertruck.
106.
by frumper 2y ago
I’m sure some people would accept being paid to try out without the company having any commitment to hiring, but those are probably not the people you’d actually want to hire. If a company can’t commit to hiring then why would a confident
107.
by frumper 2y ago
And interview is generally the opposite of unstructured conversation.
108.
by frumper 2y ago
I’d suggest battery replacement options by third party also doesn’t matter to most people.
109.
by frumper 2y ago
Every deal is more lenient than maximum or even typical penalties. Why else would people take them if not?
110.
by frumper 2y ago
He gave the reasons. He took a deal for a fine, loss of his law license for 5 years, and not pursuing lawyer fees as his punishment for what he did. In exchange for that, he would be immune from being prosecuted any further on that matter
111.
by frumper 2y ago
You're commenting on an article that puts the average wage for a teacher at 69k. That isn't a poor person unless you're redefining poor to be more than half the country. Are some paid lower, certainly. But on average, thei
112.
by frumper 2y ago
Just looked up my local California district, it's 185 contracted days. The districts near me seem to range from low 180s to 190. They also get 5 days they can call out for personal reasons(I don't think they roll over), and a ha
113.
by frumper 2y ago
You're hallucinating a conversation with me. Someone brought up asset limits as a problem. I provided contrary information, and now you're arguing with yourself about something else. You are saying something, I comment that I w
114.
by frumper 2y ago
I responded to the asset limit statement. 30+ states do not one have, it’s well over 50% of the country including 9/10 of the most populous states.
115.
by frumper 2y ago
That isn't the case for most of the country. Page 5 of the following link shows it by state. https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/publications/2018/...
116.
by frumper 2y ago
I hired an electric company to put in a car charger. In order to participate in the EV pricing program it needed a 2nd meter, which needed a permit. The actual installation was a few hours. The permitting process went back and forth betw
117.
New Florida Law Roils Its Condo Market Three Years After Surfside Collapse(wsj.com)
3 points by frumper 2y ago|0 comments
118.
by frumper 2y ago
If you think the above poster's statement doesn't adequately justify that it isn't fraud, then you should respond to him. My statement simply stated that he didn't express support one way or the other for fees, and that
119.
by frumper 2y ago
Just curious which cities require it.
120.
by frumper 2y ago
I feel like you misread his explanation of why it's not fraud as an endorsement for how things work. He doesn't seem to imply support anywhere in his statement. Aside from that, this law would not eliminate the need to do math.

More ›