3 ms·
I’m sure some people would accept being paid to try out without the company having any commitment to hiring, but those are probably not the people you’d actuall
by frumper 2y ago
I’m sure some people would accept being paid to try out without the company having any commitment to hiring, but those are probably not the people you’d actually want to hire. If a company can’t commit to hiring then why would a confident professional bother with the company? A probationary period seems like a reasonable compromise where the company commits to the expense of onboarding while still having an escape if it goes poorly.
- em-bee 2y agothose are probably not the people you’d actually want to hire why not?
- frumper 2y agoThat'd probably spawn a class of workers that are happy making a living off of trying out at places. Aside from that, why would someone that has a job quit their job for a company that won't commit to hiring them. The worker can already quit the new job if they don't like it early on. This only benefits companies.