frolig

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by frolig 7y ago

   The rise in visibility of subjective science (science of consciousness/spirituality) and integration of it with objective science will accomplish that. Luckily the subjective sciences are already highly developed, just look at Kabbalah
2. 2.▲
   by frolig 7y ago

   Maybe "the physical world" is a leaky abstraction!
3. 3.▲
   by frolig 7y ago

   ... yes, so?
4. 4.▲
   by frolig 7y ago

   A bull shits regardless of intent. Is the standard for writers "human" or "golden calf"?
5. 5.▲
   by frolig 7y ago

   Irrelevant, it's about the rhetorical device not the content.
6. 6.▲
   by frolig 8y ago

   I will testify that the cost of never leaving the house is exceedingly high.
7. 7.▲
   by frolig 8y ago

   I really don't like people who empathize, but I suggest we shake hands anyway.
8. 8.▲
   by frolig 8y ago

   Not if it implies violating customer privacy. As a company you either have a customer or an employee - you can't have it both ways. There is one way it is ethical: when you have the informed consent of volunteers. That works for charit
9. 9.▲
   by frolig 8y ago

   Grab your tinfoil hats people, it's a conspiracy theorist!
10. 10.▲
    by frolig 8y ago

    "Free as in puppy" is something people say? I don't like this meme.
11. 11.▲
    by frolig 8y ago

    Which works if you're not looking for a wife! In the context of Tesla, if the gigafactory is not the endgame.