froh

24 ms·

421.
by froh 2y ago
in the "closing thoughts" [1] of the OP article there's a pointer to "Proebstrings law" [2] which got me to a benchmark [3] how LLVM has improved over 10 years from 2.7 to 11 which leaves me with the strong intuitio
422.
by froh 2y ago
give it a bit, it then reappears (as described in the paper, btw)
423.
by froh 2y ago
json schema has nuanced and expressive constraints to validate information exchanged in json serialization. typeschema in contrast seems to focus on describing just the structure of data with the goal to generate stubs in a wide variety of
424.
by froh 2y ago
lingo is a _framework_ for building your own DSL for your go application. and by DSL they mean "extension language". like vimscript or emacs lisp. or guile or python... so you can easily add primitives to your application specif
425.
by froh 2y ago
it may depend on the cigarette brand. they treat the tobacco differently. some will put it under ammonia fumes heh and that modifies the nicotine, cracks it of sorts, which increases the potency by two or three orders of magnitude, like c
426.
by froh 2y ago
like the Ignatian model, finding G'd in everything?
427.
by froh 2y ago
https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd... wow. thanks for this gem.
428.
by froh 2y ago
is there something comparable, providing emacs bindings instead? asking for a friend.
429.
by froh 2y ago
I thought you were kidding me... here is the letter Q in PHICH: https://github.com/srsran/srsRAN_4G/blob/master/lib/src/phy/... as the sibling comment states, q is the reQuest
430.
by froh 2y ago
> read a series of books that really force your attention on to these abstractions yes yes yes as if the wet organic neutral net would "learn" a new model from the presented material and distill a solid new network to recogniz
431.
by froh 2y ago
which did you read, which would you suggest to read first? asking for a friend...
432.
by froh 2y ago
ah, a connoisseur... alas the last bottle of that was served in 1972 the current incarnation is z/VM, which started 2000. it is rumored to have one or two new features.
433.
by froh 2y ago
backdoor schmackdoor --- it's a little BSD for your safety and security how dare you slander the poor thing with such a heinous label. tsk.
434.
by froh 2y ago
what you hint at is that most workloads today don't need most of the mainframe features any more, any you can move them to commodity hardware. There is much less need for most business functions to sit on a mainframe. However the m
435.
by froh 2y ago
wow that's creepy :-) technically cool, however I'd rather prefer some semi transparent mirror set up. such a set up keeps the eyes alive.
436.
by froh 2y ago
"free" is newspeak for "rules only apply to the poor, ie.e the lower 99.9%"
437.
by froh 2y ago
Jacobi is one of 70 IBM Fellows (think IBM internal professors, free reign over a research budget, you gain the title with technical prowess plus business acumen) at the heart of the Mainframe success is this: > I’d say high-availability
438.
by froh 2y ago
in my experience there's always so much more to data structures that you can shoehorn into member functions. I agree type hints are a godsend for discoverability, but please, show me all operations this type can be a parameter for. I w
439.
by froh 2y ago
yup. I marveled at a cray y-mp 4 back in the days. now I use one as my daily driver, compute power wise. mind. blown. come to think about it...
440.
by froh 2y ago
I see. so there are _two_ replies necessary here. first, to your question above, repeated here. indeed meta "guesses" your age, gender identity, sexual orientation, political party affiliation, stance on various political issues,
441.
by froh 2y ago
now live in a country that punishes you for being gay. and have someone incidentally glance over your shoulder with them gay ads in your stream. do you see the danger these ads put you in?
442.
by froh 2y ago
> it necessarily involves conduct, activity or interests. nit: did you mean conduct (which connotes moral principles) or did you mean plain behaviour (which doesn't lump what you do together with if it's "right" or &q
443.
by froh 2y ago
the title of the talk is "Why (and how) we’re migrating many of our servers from Linux to the BSDs" and that should be the title of this post too. I like that the blog post shares the slides, not just the video.
444.
by froh 2y ago
> The problem is that the average person doesn't know how to explain & solve a problem in sufficient detail to get a working solution. I intuit this also is an intrinsic limit to LLM based approaches to "you don't need
445.
by froh 2y ago
yes, there are indications for this to be true, however, it's _extremely_ hard to find clinicians willing to and courageous enough to work with patients with psychotic experiences on trauma. basically admitting psychotic episodes kicks
446.
by froh 2y ago
the gcc very clearly states it can be used to create proprietary software. always has. the same goes for anything LGPL licensed, but I'd be surprised if you count that as GPL ;-)
447.
by froh 2y ago
I love it :-) However, would it be possible to come up with a UI that doesn't need to "Read and change all your data on all websites." ? I feel uncomfortable with that.
448.
by froh 2y ago
funny enough, tcl browser plugins were around from at least 1996 https://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/programming/tcl/plugin/ I'm pretty sure some fellow students came into our computer room before that,
449.
by froh 2y ago
the git history of the linux kernel documents the Linux kernel detailed Design, the reasoning how things fit together. I've used it several times to understand why things are done the way they are. The discussion leading to this design
450.
by froh 2y ago
sigh I guess any downvote button will be abused, no matter which way you try to say "voting means 'contributes to the conversation'"

More ›