frodob12

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by frodob12 9y ago

   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832508 Last i looked no-one wanted to maintain the shim, upstream looked dead, but things may have changed.
2. 2.▲
   by frodob12 9y ago

   Another is that they can see where the systemd bus is going and it's not somewhere they choose to follow.
3. 3.▲
   by frodob12 9y ago

   But these are hard deps not just recommends so will pull in systemd dependencies regardless of it using them or not. If it were a recomends type dep, again no one would have a problem. It used to be considered bad packaging to hard dep when
4. 4.▲
   by frodob12 9y ago

   They were told to by debian. They argued for as long as they could while debian was still 'their' distribution to change the direction systemd would take it. It was clean that wasn't going to happen. Final response; "If
5. 5.▲
   by frodob12 9y ago

   That is the main complaint.