frizlab

28 ms·

811.
by frizlab 1y ago
The lowkey makes sense. It’s more or less what they did with “close friends” on instagram, no?
812.
Backup to Go 2(ohanaware.com)
1 points by frizlab 1y ago|0 comments
813.
by frizlab 1y ago
My brother defended a thesis that actually made sense and had the means to do it though he did not write his story. (Caveat: I did not understand his subject. Caveat 2: Professor was his (and thus my) uncle.)
814.
by frizlab 1y ago
When I read the title of the article in my RSS feed my first instinct was to go straight to here with a snarky “How was it not actually AI that did this?” in my head… As usual I was not disappointed.
815.
by frizlab 1y ago
Not at all, but I only verified the tests to run on all platforms. I have not checked interoperability with other languages. Verifying the tests pass is just to make sure my lib can be used on these platforms if anybody wanted to use them.
816.
by frizlab 1y ago
Swift can now be used on embedded platforms
817.
by frizlab 1y ago
> Let's say i want to expose an async call to a local sqlite instance on android. I don’t know, I don’t do android dev. I just made sure my library was running on it then moved on. I know Swift is working on having bidirectional int
818.
iOS denial-of-service using Darwin notifications(rambo.codes)
4 points by frizlab 1y ago|0 comments
819.
by frizlab 1y ago
> the swift wasm project still uses a forked compiler IIRC… No < https://forums.swift.org/t/stdlib-and-runtime-tests-for-wasm... >. Like I told you, I cross compile to all of the targets directly on my Mac (ex
820.
by frizlab 1y ago
You have to create your own docker-like registry, or use a public one.
821.
by frizlab 1y ago
That is probably the opposite of true. Go read the forums once in a while, the foundations are really well thought. I agree that function builders were probably added for the shiny SwiftUI (and was added too soon), as well as the property w
822.
by frizlab 1y ago
The only thing XML Xcode generates are storyboards and xibs (and schemes also). All of those XMLs are readable. Xcode’s build system is very reasonable (though different than on other IDEs, but that does not mean bad!).
823.
by frizlab 1y ago
Depends what framework you link it with.
824.
by frizlab 1y ago
> macOS Is Not A Server OS It does not matter, Swift server-side can run (and be built) on Linux (or Windows BTW, or even embedded platforms (a subset of the language anyway))…
825.
by frizlab 1y ago
There were also issues in the generated code, yeah. But to be fair that front has been hugely enhanced; it’s been a very long while since I’ve since the Swift compiler crash (and I do weird stuff too).
826.
by frizlab 1y ago
When was your most recent attempt? I think the `vapor` tool has been updated a few weeks ago[1]. Basically it was an old tool that worked around some limitations around SPM and Xcode, but it is mostly unneeded nowadays. It is basically a si
827.
by frizlab 1y ago
Probably modifiers in the binary number, where a specific bit means something. That gives very large numbers in the end.
828.
by frizlab 1y ago
No. I tried, the person from which I initially based my conf repo[1] tried too[2], we both went away from it (w/o communication between us). We both realized Ansible is good for managing many machines in a professional environment, but
829.
by frizlab 1y ago
I have an open-source script which installs all my conf https://github.com/Frizlab/frizlabs-conf
830.
by frizlab 1y ago
You don’t have to be on the Apple ecosystem to use Swift. They have full Linux compatibility and an official (as is supported by the Swiftlang group, not even Apple, thought it’s more or less the same) VSCode extension. They have a lot of
831.
by frizlab 1y ago
ObjC interoperability is a solved problem now for Swift. They are even adding C++ and Java interop too!
832.
by frizlab 1y ago
Personally I initially come from the « Apple world » but now I use Swift on the server and it’s a joy. By far my favorite language ever. I even wrote a tool to be able to run Swift scripts that have non-system dependencies![1] [1] https:&#
833.
by frizlab 1y ago
Yes. I speculate they are actually working on this internally but I have no proof (they must have thought about it!). All the advances in the virtualization they are currently doing makes me think they will eventually release a built in c
834.
by frizlab 1y ago
I think tuples will be (soon-ish) Hashable but cannot as of now because they want to do it right and need something before they can do it.
835.
by frizlab 1y ago
It is not stuck on a single ecosystem and VSCode has an extension to use Swift in it. The Linux ecosystem is actually getting quite interesting tbh, and they even support embedded targets!
836.
by frizlab 1y ago
Nice! An issue I’ve had with Huly self-hosted is upgrading, which is very hard because it is not documented (as far as I know). How are upgrades handled on your project?
837.
Swift Container Plugin(github.com)
86 points by frizlab 1y ago|96 comments
838.
by frizlab 1y ago
Hello! How does this compare to Huly?
839.
by frizlab 1y ago
> then you don’t know what you’re talking about Do you though? How is that so obvious the human brain is “just an algorithm?” We don’t know what consciousness even is currently AFAIK. Nobody does.
840.
by frizlab 1y ago
Cool! I searched for this and never found a suitable option. This one looks like to be checking all of the boxes I need!

More ›