Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frivoal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
frivoal
7y ago
> If it doesn't have any absolutely positioned or floating child elements, wouldn't that imply contain: content? Not just children, but descendants at arbitrary depth. Also no relative positioning, negative margins making anyth
32.
▲
by
frivoal
7y ago
W3C didn't loose Mozilla over EME. 1) Mozilla is still an active participant in W3C (there are many more things than HTML there) 2) Mozilla supported EME. Maybe reluctantly, but supported it nonetheless.
33.
▲
by
frivoal
7y ago
For HTML and DOM, this is true. There are many more things at the W3C, the most obvious of which is probably CSS. Browsers totally pay attention to what these spec says, and are the dominant participants in producing these specs.
34.
▲
by
frivoal
7y ago
> The W3C is not open to input from all. If you open a GitHub issue contributing an idea, but do not pay member fees, they cannot incorporate your idea into the spec, because of Intellectual Property Rights concerns. There is no way in t
35.
▲
by
frivoal
7y ago
There were serious issues with the way HTML was done at W3C, and this agreement between W3C and the WHATWG is a good thing. However, all W3C specs are developed in the open, nowadays on github, and feedback from anyone anywhere is taken ser
36.
▲
by
frivoal
8y ago
I think you were probably trying to find this article: https://web.archive.org/web/20190119000840/https://plus.goog...
37.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
CSS Working group person here. We're trying. Grid (also Flexbox, but mainly grid) should be a large part of the solution, as it significantly reduces the need for divs that are just there for layout purposes. display:content should als
38.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
Having to use a specific point release of the compiler to work does not necessarily means later version have a bug. It could also mean that the program is (accidentally) depending on implementation details that are not guaranteed by the lan
39.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
For yourself, maybe. If you intend to share the code you write (or use code written by others), then implementation differences start to matter.
40.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
W3C decided to publish a final version of the EME specification. W3C is the place where member companies come to write and negotiate the specification for how many web technologies should work. EME is an API for talking to a audio/vide
41.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
1) EME doesn't work like that 2) EME has been shipping in all browsers for a while. This hasn't happened.
42.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
They are not a W3C member, and do not contribute to standards. So no.
43.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
That's the wrong question. W3C itself is relatively tiny, and has fairly ordinary (albeit well tuned) software/server infrastructure. Reproducing the legal framework would be more of a pain, but even that could probably be done. B
44.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
Alternatively, the animals aren't radiation hardened and do die of cancer, but not fast enough to get in the way of breeding and multiplying. Or, in other words, while radioactive waste is unhealthy, it fatality rate is lower than havi
45.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
I believe they want to, but the appeals process is an untested one, and will be evaluated by the same people who made the original decision. Don't get your hopes too high.
46.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
How so? The effect of DRM is to prevent the user from doing things that would otherwise be technically possible, such as copying. Once the software has decrypted the media, it can do whatever it wants with it. It is just so designed that wh
47.
▲
by
frivoal
9y ago
The best answer I know to this was written by Hixie (main editor of the HTML spec) a few years back: https://plus.google.com/+IanHickson/posts/iPmatxBYuj2
48.
▲
Media Queries Level 4
(florian.rivoal.net)
3 points
by
frivoal
9y ago
|
0 comments
49.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
Unless I am misunderstanding something, all the answers here seem to assume that the friend is either able finish instantly, or to leave before he is done. That isn't stated in the question, so I don't think it's valid to ass
50.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
I have a Jekyll install set up to do just that. It's quite primitive, but better than nothing.
51.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
It's not being used in the desktop browser anymore, but some consumer electronics project still under maintenance are, and so is Opera mini.
52.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
A litlle. Intonation and non verbal cues help a bit with disambiguation. Also, while pinyin can have tone markers, they are a pain to type and are often omitted. It is not rare to see people who are having an oral conversation disambiguate
53.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
I was maintaining a port of the Opera browser for Japanese feature phones in 2007. We supported flash in 11Mb of RAM: 6 for the browser, 5 for flash. That included the screen buffer IIRC. We ran regular desktop web sites under these conditi
54.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
There's a huge difference between being able to speak nicely despite being a dick, and not being a dick. I don't care if someone curses or is blunt about how they think something sucks, but one joke about how a certain person from
55.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
I blame the browsers. There's no deep reason you have to introduce a piece of javascript to hide stuff from the browser so that it can load the page normally, and then add back the fonts. If browsers cared about making the web usable f
56.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
It bought NeXT.
57.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
Everyone has a smartphone, except a handful of old people who have an app-capable high-end feature-phone. Taxis are pretty much everywhere, never had to call for one except when it rains and I want to be picked up at my door.
58.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
> Are you operating from the premise that a non-monarchy is strictly and uniformly superior? I do, from a moral point of view, before even going into the than a practical one (even though there are practical reasons as well). I believe t
59.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
> Strangely (to me) people sing the praises of democracy and disparage their existing democratically elected government with the same breath. There's nothing strange about that. The point of democracy is not to make governments grea
60.
▲
by
frivoal
10y ago
The answer you're looking for is here: https://plus.google.com/+IanHickson/posts/iPmatxBYuj2 (no, seriously)
More ›