frio

35 ms·

331.
by frio 13y ago
Thanks for this; I look forward to giving it a go tonight!
332.
by frio 13y ago
They're actually quite similar. Docker is to lightweight containers as Vagrant is to virtual machines (more or less anyway; Vagrant lets you configure a lot more at this point). The nice thing is that the Dockerfile makes the whole t
333.
by frio 13y ago
I use LT productively at the moment and really enjoy it, so thanks ibdknox! I did see on one of the mailing lists that you had spiked up an integration with JSHint, and that might make it into LT 0.5. Is that still the case, or have you de
334.
by frio 13y ago
The tutorial makes no mention of sub-keys. I thought using sub-keys was a generally accepted good practice? The use-case being that if the sub-key is compromised, you can invalidate it and issue a new one -- and others who trust the root
335.
by frio 13y ago
Having used Puppet and Chef in the past, Salt is a breath of fresh air. I've found it much simpler to use.
336.
by frio 13y ago
While Orkut's fair game, the rest is Google X, which I'd consider a reasonably different ball-game.
337.
by frio 13y ago
The design of this seems very similar to yoleoreader.com. I'm not having a go; I suspect that as this market space becomes more popular, we will see lots of similar designs (even if they're arrived at independently) -- but it mig
338.
by frio 13y ago
With vagrant, I can create a vagrantfile. This says: "create a VM using this basic distribution, this networking configuration, these forwarded ports, and this hardware exposed". It defines the basic machine. I can then use &quo
339.
by frio 13y ago
From skimming the top level of comments, it seems most people don't like these tools. Fair enough. That said, on-topic, I just wanted to say that having tried Puppet, Chef and Salt, I've found Salt the easiest to use. Straightfo
340.
by frio 13y ago
Most of the work for the "hacker alternative" is already done, in the form of [iRedmail]. [iRedMail]: http://www.iredmail.org/
341.
by frio 13y ago
Space usage doesn't worry me too much. If a "package" is just a set of files, then storing them in some sort of compressed form (.tar.gz) and simply un-tarring them and making the API mimic a git repo with one revision should be fairly s
342.
A Solution for Go Versioning(go-versioning.pen.io)
2 points by frio 13y ago|0 comments
343.
by frio 13y ago
This sounds like a problem the community can resolve. Check http://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Remote_import_path_syntax -- anyone can create a Go "repo" by using a <meta> tag in an HTML page. I don't think it'd be difficult to create
344.
by frio 13y ago
``subl`` also works in both Windows and Linux. If you're a huge OSS proponent though, then Sublime is quite clearly not for you anyway.
345.
by frio 13y ago
I can't see any screenshots, link to a demo, etc. Asking for $18 up front with no indication of quality is a bit rough.
346.
by frio 14y ago
The distinction is: return [Integer] will give you [[Integer]] (if you're inside the list Monad). $($("#some-id")) will give you the same result as $("#some-id"), because $ of a $ doesn't nest (or make sense, really). Therefore jQuery doesn
347.
by frio 14y ago
For list comprehensions, it's the same syntax, but in ()s rather than []s. A generator will be lazily evaluated (so until something tries to get a value out, nothing is computed) and can only be iterated through once. That's pretty much t
348.
by frio 14y ago
Not to be discouraging, but: what does this offer me that Pinboard doesn't?
349.
by frio 14y ago
I know an upvote is all we're supposed to offer when agreeing, but given the rest of the discussion here, it's probably worth putting it in writing too. The response well-written, thoughtful articles like this garner saddens me.
350.
by frio 14y ago
If you're interested in this kind of thing, try reading the book Hacking Healthcare. From what I gather so far (haven't quite finished), there are large costs that are incurred by dealing with insurance. The USA's billing system -- matchin
351.
by frio 14y ago
Nothing, but currently there's no way to try it before buying, which is a problem.
352.
by frio 14y ago
It's no more than a wrapper around Kombu; it shouldn't be hard to get one going yourself :). It's far from the level of quality of the OP's product.
353.
by frio 14y ago
Heh, I'd forgotten about that one :D. I've had the idea kicking around for a long time, and have spiked it in a few different languages (the Haskell version was mainly to try out FRP and reactive-banana; I've got the furthest on a Python o
354.
by frio 14y ago
I've been building something similar in Erlang/Elixir (OTP's a very good match for an event-driven system which connects a series of inputs to outputs), but never quite managed to get it integrated beyond a few minor inputs/outputs (the fac
355.
by frio 14y ago
Welp, neat!
356.
by frio 14y ago
For sure -- the physical aspect is definitely something worth mitigating too (in both the case of the Prezzy Card store, and the Net Cafes having video). If I was going full paranoid, I'd probably find some way of altering my appearance t
357.
by frio 14y ago
I've recently started tinkering with my Arduino again, and was going to start looking for a tool to build some basic schematics online. Good timing; CircuitLab looks awesome!
358.
by frio 14y ago
Maybe in my quest to be a smartarse, I'm the one missing it... but why can't you just use > in both those cases? EDIT -- after tinkering around with the console, I see. I'm wiping the file out by writing to it (>) before it's finis
359.
by frio 14y ago
> Reality check: if your credit card details are visible to a third party - you're not anonymous. After attending a local security conference last year (Kiwicon), I briefly tried to see how anonymous I could make myself online. In NZ,
360.
by frio 14y ago
Just to be a smartarse ;): cat <<EOF > output.txt some input EOF

More ›