frfsfgxffd

5 ms·

1.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
just yesterday on the pro-cashless WSJ article comments someone mentioned the fbi was a bad actor, and everyone jumped in saying there were so many rules added after JER that something bad would never happen again. sigh.
2.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
not to mention, depending on the license it was obtained, they can probably resell it.
3.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
yeah. bing announced a long time ago they dropped support for things like exclusion (-) it's mostly garbage now for complex queries. still use ddg tho.
4.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
messengers are the new email.
5.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
what's about the time difference that makes it better or worse? i vote for my local representative exactly because he will use tax payer money to improve my street and make sure zoning rules make my buildings more valuable. any winner
6.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
...this is already legal for some decades. if you are in a rewards program you agreed to have you anonymized sales history (i mean, they will not list "ate burgers" but "ate at fiveguys" is pretty similar). after that yo
7.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
> Bank transactions are trivially traceable and reversible by the state instant, cashless, transactions are not reversible, and can be withdrawal instantly on the other end. sum that with the usual practice of employing disposables young
8.
by frfsfgxffd 3y ago
Brazil is almost cashless today. first month with central bank digital currency, instant kidnaps were thru the roof. the "solution" lower limits of how much you can transfer. what a joke. now only 100usd per day can leave your poc