freeloop2

3 ms·

1.
by freeloop2 9y ago
But not the most stringent drug laws.
2.
by freeloop2 9y ago
Most countries do this. I don't know why people always pick on the US in this regard.
3.
by freeloop2 9y ago
That's too hard on my knees. I got a kettlebell and go on YouTube everyday to find some exercise videos. There are so many videos I can do a new one each time which prevents me from getting bored.
4.
by freeloop2 9y ago
Stereoptics ruin the illusion. Just like a 2d vs a 3d movie
5.
by freeloop2 9y ago
Anytime you trade one cryptocurrency for another, you also are taxed
6.
by freeloop2 9y ago
That isn't a double spend!
7.
by freeloop2 9y ago
A double spend isn't an invalid block. This renders the rest of your argument invalid.
8.
by freeloop2 9y ago
You can effectively freeze anyone's funds by refusing any transactions that originate from their address
9.
by freeloop2 9y ago
Your link doesn't address the question. It's about an invalid transaction within the block, not the refusal to place a particular transaction into one. With over 50% of mining power you can definitely do this.
10.
by freeloop2 9y ago
The problem with this attitude is the next generation will then only have only have the offspring of non environmentally conscious people. You shouldn't trade the chance to shape the culture of the next generation to be more environmen
11.
by freeloop2 9y ago
You can talk about it all you want. I don't think anyone has begun to come up with a realistic solution. You can't make it against the law to mine, so what else is there?
12.
by freeloop2 9y ago
Do you have actual evidence this is the case, or is it just supposition? I've been using DuckDuckGo for the last week and whenever I was unable to find something relevant I'd try the same query in Google and also come up short. Ev