freejazz

9 ms·

241.
by freejazz 6mo ago
Sorry, did people not identify needs when developing "high value software" before? That doesn't seem true to me at all. I took a "Needs Assessment" course in my class of '09 undergrad...
242.
by freejazz 6mo ago
It seems like so many developers know this, yet here we are. SV pushing this AI slop economy. More code! Faster! Less testing! Less understanding! It's what we NEED !
243.
by freejazz 6mo ago
> You could start by sharing a coherent thought beyond "Facebook bad" on this topic. There's nothing incoherent about that thought, which is also not what I expressed anyway. It's not my burden to solve Facebook'
244.
by freejazz 6mo ago
>You don't use any words, other than repeatedly saying "Facebook should be solving this problem they created", so people have to fill in the gaps because that is a very strange perspective and you refuse to elaborate. Thin
245.
by freejazz 6mo ago
> Debates over where you draw the line are absolutely a matter of wokeness. This is offensive in how trite it is
246.
by freejazz 6mo ago
ADA preceeded wokeness by at least 2 decades
247.
by freejazz 6mo ago
> You've decided that there's some relatively easy solution I never used these words either. That's where the dishonesty is. Look back at our thread, how many times have you done that? You ask me to define basic words and
248.
by freejazz 6mo ago
I don't see others trying to tell me what you are. > Content moderation is a general problem, Easy to reform any problem in a more general manner. Doesn't make your discussion any less dishonest. >As I said before, I would w
249.
by freejazz 6mo ago
>It's useful for things like elections, where though popular media might push one line of thought primarily, the markets will adjust to be closer to the reality. Pretty visible in the 2024 elections where if you followed mainstream
250.
by freejazz 6mo ago
For sure I agree, but was of course severely downvoted every time I asked how anyone besides the inside trader benefit. Aaaand now I'm being downvoted again.
251.
by freejazz 6mo ago
People keep saying they provide the market with information, and that's the benefit of allowing the insider trading, but no one has pointed out how in any way society has benefitted from the insider trading instances so far...
252.
by freejazz 6mo ago
But its not a general problem, it's a problem specifically about child porn that we are discussing. The idea that there is no point in discussing the child porn problem on Facebook is exactly what I'm disputing.
253.
by freejazz 6mo ago
Trying so hard not to say child porn.
254.
by freejazz 6mo ago
Them to actually undertake meaningful efforts to reduce the child porn on their platform. Crazy, I know.
255.
by freejazz 6mo ago
So you don't care that you're wrong? Not a surprise coming from someone handwaving away the mess Meta made.
256.
by freejazz 6mo ago
Exactly, no one put a gun to Meta's head and ordered them to make Facebook.
257.
by freejazz 6mo ago
It certainly is not.
258.
by freejazz 6mo ago
No, being so large that it's such a problem for them.
259.
by freejazz 6mo ago
You classified it as a choice, not me.
260.
by freejazz 6mo ago
>I will reluctantly grant Meta that they're up against a really hard problem here. It is a problem of their own making.
261.
by freejazz 6mo ago
>That's a tradeoff you can choose to make, but you need to enter into it with open eyes. No it's not. It's certainly not my choice. No one asked me if it's okay for Facebook to distribute CSAM because you insist it wo
262.
by freejazz 6mo ago
I don't understand why their size is an excuse for them to not remove and prevent CSAM.
263.
by freejazz 6mo ago
>The current predictions, and the predictions from a few years ago is more on 2030. They weren't back then. >I personally think we are running in a very critical / interesting phase of 5-15 years were we will see how it migh
264.
by freejazz 6mo ago
And?
265.
by freejazz 6mo ago
If you had dignity, you'd probably not want to have an AI write for you was my point
266.
by freejazz 6mo ago
> You mean like "I feel shameful over that people saw that my writing was actually AI?" or something else? Well if you don't have dignity in the first place, its hard to have any shame over losing it
267.
by freejazz 6mo ago
Doing fine so far, thanks!
268.
by freejazz 6mo ago
When you're applying reasoning like this, sure, why not? What difference would it make?
269.
by freejazz 6mo ago
If claude made it, it is not a copyrightable work. There is no copyright for anyone to own.
270.
by freejazz 6mo ago
> Claude is not a legal entity And? >It would be as ridiculous as blaming the car in a car accident where you drove over someone. No more ridiculous than you posting something you know nothing about. Just because you don't get th

More ›