freejazz

7 ms·

181.
by freejazz 4mo ago
>Or why not make an actual plan to improve things and solve problems instead of throwing in the towel before you even start? I don't know, you tell me? According to you it's reasonable enough in this scenario.
182.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Yeah, why not make up a bunch of lies?
183.
by freejazz 4mo ago
A generous response
184.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Trump sells all sorts of things. Anyone buying any of it is a fool.
185.
by freejazz 4mo ago
No, its a play on the word roundabouts
186.
by freejazz 4mo ago
And a foolish 16 % at that
187.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Yeah, I just made the heating elements for the ovens, not the doors!
188.
by freejazz 4mo ago
>You really think if they didn't work there, someone else wouldn't? What does that have to do with any person's individual morals?
189.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Meta's problem isn't that they "maximize shareholder value" it's how they decided to go about doing it.
190.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Suddenly its not in SV's favor? Depends who you ask, I guess
191.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Goodbye tradesecret!
192.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Really? They can't get any other tech jobs? They have to work for AI companies? Give me a break
193.
by freejazz 4mo ago
And?
194.
by freejazz 4mo ago
And its been 3 years of AI boosters telling me that my job as a litigating attorney will not exist in 2 months. Yet here I am, gainfully employed.
195.
by freejazz 4mo ago
Every day people here debate whether or not there are any actual productivity gains from LLM, and it's only in the limited context of software development. While I understand that this place obviously skews heavily towards the software
196.
by freejazz 5mo ago
Both.
197.
by freejazz 5mo ago
A taste of their own medicine. Turns out it is bitter.
198.
by freejazz 5mo ago
> Where are the people and politicians with optimism and a vision? Seems like an assumption on your part that being pro-data center reflects "vision" and "optimism."
199.
by freejazz 5mo ago
Backrooms is Marvel for 4chaners and other very online people, let's be honest.
200.
by freejazz 5mo ago
>DVDs and even video tape are relatively recent. Yeah and it was a different business model before then with a lot more people going to theatres
201.
by freejazz 5mo ago
> But you can run Steam on Linux And how many people run linux that this is even relevant?
202.
by freejazz 5mo ago
> They are human after all and have overestimated the capabilities of LLMs They self-servingly overinflated the capabilities and now its coming to roost.
203.
by freejazz 5mo ago
But you already conceded the odds were not accurate. > But providing accurate odds on a wide array of topics isn't yelling fire in a crowded theater and the results of the election did reflect the polymarket odds. I didn't say
204.
by freejazz 5mo ago
>That's only possible if the financial system is valuing things systematically incorrectly. ...have you looked around? Some of the biggest companies in our economy basically just serve ads...
205.
by freejazz 5mo ago
All seem trivial compared to the money sucked up by billionaires, who seem to do little good for society. I'm not going to get angry at a police officer trying to maximize their retirement when we live in a society that celebrates peop
206.
by freejazz 5mo ago
If the information does not make a difference, what is the point of the information? White noise is "information". Yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre is "information". What is the point? > As for the electi
207.
by freejazz 5mo ago
Have you ever looked at securities laws?
208.
by freejazz 5mo ago
>An example would be the latest presidential election, where professional pollsters at them at almost 50/50, but the prediction markets had trump by a landslide. He went on to win even the popular vote. Trump didn't win by a la
209.
by freejazz 5mo ago
>where the risks of insiderism or gaming are negligible, and there's extremely large public interest in it. So what's the point of polymarket, then? If at best we get "negligible" "insiderism", how is it tha
210.
by freejazz 5mo ago
It seems like it's a huge assumption on your part that the bets you are describing are in the "0.89" range and not something significantly higher, even disregarding what others pointed out about this having already provably o

More ›