freejazz

7 ms·

121.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> So will you owe life long compensation for all the knowledge you got from books too? You're just falling into the trap of anthropomorphizing the phrase "training" in the context of LLMs, which is not the same things as w
122.
by freejazz 3mo ago
It's not a settled area of law and there is a SDNY judge that has a completely different application of the fair use analysis in the same exact context and came to a completely different conclusion (that it is not fair use).
123.
by freejazz 3mo ago
>But if I'm reading the ruling correctly, Anthropic might have been fine even with feeding pirated books into their LLM (as long as they planned to eventually deleted them afterwards) You're not. Even if training is fair use, i
124.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> There needs to be a royalty payment based on if the AI regurgitates existing ideas. The settlement does not pertain to any outputs
125.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Did you read the complaint? Maybe start there if you're going to be asking questions like this. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28453229-apple-v-ope...
126.
by freejazz 3mo ago
He's getting sued too. If Ben and Jerry's didn't disseminate your memo on how to steal trade secrets from your former employer to its new hires, I'd think you'd have a better point.
127.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Anyone is free to demand anything. You can even say no to a judge. You wont like that result, though.
128.
by freejazz 3mo ago
But he stole it, no? What's ambiguous about that?
129.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> There are no practical laws against understanding the laws of physics, chemistry, and metallurgy when it comes to anodizing And unsurprisingly, that's not what the lawsuit is over!
130.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Unnecessarily cute? It's a documented campaign of industrial-scale theft...
131.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Painfully obtuse
132.
by freejazz 3mo ago
You're a troll
133.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Hard to make it clearer that you didn't read/understand the decision than a post like this
134.
by freejazz 3mo ago
It's like you are starting to get it.
135.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> Nobody whose family comes from China, Vietnam, etc., has grandparents who could vote in 1950. So those countries should deal with those issues, then? I really don't understand how you are allowed to post so much all over this webs
136.
by freejazz 3mo ago
>You can’t have class actions based on pre-existing groups (say, “Italians”). You have to define the group in a way that provides a high level of certainty that all class members were subject to the harm that’s the basis for the suit. Ye
137.
by freejazz 3mo ago
In what way did your cousin ever have anything in this context? His admission wasn't rescinded, he never had it in the first place.
138.
by freejazz 3mo ago
But we are talking about new data centers that are usually being built for the exact purpose of housing AI facilities? I'm not sure why you are being so obtuse about this point. Stating what already exists in data centers in general mi
139.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> 40 is a massive number Where does that leave 60, then?
140.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> areas won't move the needle Wont move the needle? Go ahead and build shit in your community, I'm happy its being kept out of mine. Stop trying to pretend like NY is trying to legislate the nation by maintaining its own front
141.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Yeah! It really sucks. Still, what should NY do of that?
142.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> that doesn’t mean the government is efficient or without fraud Don't really see anyone suggesting that.
143.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Doge was a scam, of course.
144.
by freejazz 3mo ago
> Coding as in typing in the code might be solved haha
145.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Not enough!
146.
by freejazz 3mo ago
How so?
147.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Great if you want to make virtual child porn, I guess.
148.
by freejazz 3mo ago
Add me to the list too, please.
149.
by freejazz 3mo ago
>Careful you don't "it's just a text predictor" yourself into unemployment . says more than anything else could
150.
by freejazz 3mo ago
>"What is the argument for legalizing drugs that are contraindicated for all medical purposes, are toxic, and have a high addictive potential?

More ›