freejazz

29 ms·

811.
by freejazz 1y ago
Are they? What about the ones that aren't here illegally? Trump told the Supreme Court that Kilmar Garcia was wrongfully deported, but they had no obligation to bring him back anyway. Is that what you are talking about?
812.
by freejazz 1y ago
Well, it's what Trump said they would do. So they can either do it or he's lying.
813.
by freejazz 1y ago
Due process? Who cares?! ICE doesn't need due process and Trump said Americans aren't entitled to it anyway. Do you think Americans are special?
814.
by freejazz 1y ago
"illegals" Doing a lot of work for you there.
815.
by freejazz 1y ago
Guess what is also true of the US population in general...
816.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yeah, going either way. Let it not be mentioned at all, imo.
817.
by freejazz 1y ago
So? There is no more evidence to suggest they are the same than what you've already rejected here as evidencing difference.
818.
by freejazz 1y ago
The number of times that OpenAI is producing verbatim copies of NYT's articles... for one. That wasn't so hard to think of.
819.
by freejazz 1y ago
>We will all make a lot more money and a lot more progress by storing, organizing, presenting, and processing knowledge as effectively as possible. That's a huge assumption in the first place. An even bigger leap to tie that general
820.
by freejazz 1y ago
That's not entirely true. A lot of their briefing refers to how impractical and expensive it would be to license all the content they need for the models.
821.
by freejazz 1y ago
>How is this guy different from any other of the thousands moderately-successful tech people with an obscure hobby project (Urbit). Just because of his far-out-there views? Did you read the article? Because he sits in immediate proximity
822.
by freejazz 1y ago
RAGE?
823.
by freejazz 1y ago
> Everything they are doing is explicitly allowed by the OS Do you mean that the OS provides for this possibility in a technical sense? Or do you mean that the OS explicitly gave them permission to do this exact thing (and that permissio
824.
by freejazz 1y ago
If you're a tech ceo, then maybe yeah.... I've seen bankers that are more reflective about their actions than these tech leaders. Tech would kill the goose laying golden eggs just because they could find enough people to believe t
825.
by freejazz 1y ago
This is the kind of comment that starts the conversational bar at such a low point there really is no point in engaging with it.
826.
by freejazz 1y ago
Have you considered his actual films with actual puppets?
827.
by freejazz 1y ago
You're missing the point. Your conjecture is false. Sure, you never said it proved anything. But that's a different point. Your entire premise is just completely made up. You're not even expressing a leap of faith. It's
828.
by freejazz 1y ago
> If we believe there was no purpose for all of this, then what a hopeless thing. That's a huge leap that speaks to your own perspective. It's not some sort of objective fact. That there is no purpose and we are still here is i
829.
by freejazz 1y ago
Hasn't stopped the Trump administration from its numerous embarrassing uses
830.
by freejazz 1y ago
It was not a given that Garry's work was valuable. >Now imagine you tell someone with poor mental health who struggling at a low paying job that all you have to do is write something 100 times a day to make it happen. Sorry, did you
831.
by freejazz 1y ago
It was well before he was a buddhist. Did you see The Zen Diaries of Garry Shandling? There's pages and pages of him writing down how great he will be... > Those are not the same thing. Here's an idea: get informed on the basic
832.
by freejazz 1y ago
I have to squint to read your post because it is so greyed-out
833.
by freejazz 1y ago
Lol, Garry Shandling "manifested" if you deeply care enough about something to actually spend the time to write it out 100 times in a day, you might also take some other actions...
834.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's a bit disingenuous. What of the subway was built before 1913 that is even relevant to discussion today? Even before 1913 it was enacted by the legislature. I just find all of your posting here so shy of the relevant truths as to b
835.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yes, manhattan is the only special place in the country that can have public transit. Oh wait yeah, except for Queens! No, they aren't particularly alike and yes it is true that plenty of cities outside of the US have great public tran
836.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Have you been to New York? Rude. I'm a lifelong New Yorker and nothing about your posts seem reasonable or made apparent by anything that's just "obvious" about being in new york. There's also great bus transit
837.
by freejazz 1y ago
>New York's subways were built by private companies That's not even remotely true. Which I only found out two paragraphs into this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_New_York_City_S... because i
838.
by freejazz 1y ago
You're already not getting past my first round.
839.
by freejazz 1y ago
> crowd by setting them 10+mph too slow for a given road In NYC at least, they are set for speeds that make the roads safer for other users, such as pedestrians. They are not set in order to please the perception of drivers.
840.
by freejazz 1y ago
Really? Seems more like the scams that keep it going? What's the utility that is keeping it going?

More ›