freejazz

19 ms·

601.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's not me that's not getting it.
602.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Then that's the actual answer to the question they were asking. It's already done before you're given the document. It's not the actual answer. Having a standardized resource location scheme is a solved problem in th
603.
by freejazz 1y ago
You could, give an example to support your argument as opposed to just telling everyone that you are right.
604.
by freejazz 1y ago
The idea that cases settle before trial because of Plaintiff's and not defendants is pretty silly. I'm not sure where everyone got the idea that the powerful people in this country are personal injury attorneys and not the giganti
605.
by freejazz 1y ago
Oy! Why do people do this? Yeah they might want to argue that. It's not going to get very far considering that the issue is they are actually just trying to turn their copyright into a trademark, so no court is just going to ignore tha
606.
by freejazz 1y ago
And? Trademark isn't copyright law. It doesn't operate the same way. You can indicate that something isn't being used as a mark to indicate source (all trademark protects) and therefore it isn't necessarily an infringeme
607.
by freejazz 1y ago
It's not two minutes per citation and the notion that something that is "very expensive" but otherwise doesn't have a use case unless you're using AI in the first place is a ridiculous proposition. To call what I wr
608.
by freejazz 1y ago
Your response seems a bit over the top especially considering it is a civil case
609.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Do lawyers and judges not by now have software that turns all these citations into hyperlinks into some relevant database? Software that would also flag a citation as not having a referent? Surely this exists and is expensive but in wid
610.
by freejazz 1y ago
I'm a lawyer and I do not use AI. I was given a product test of an AI legal solution and it was terrible.
611.
by freejazz 1y ago
It prevents Disney from being able to file TRO or preliminary injunction preventing the commercial from being aired (and protected M&M from having to spend resources fighting that, which will do nothing to actually determine the overall
612.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Mickey is still a trademark of the Disney corporation. Mickey, yeah. But steamboat willie is covered by a copyright that has now since expired.
613.
by freejazz 1y ago
>That seems very reasonable. Otherwise, stealing money, lending it out for interest, and then returning the stolen money while keeping the interest would be a viable way to earn money. Copyright infringement plaintiffs are entitled to di
614.
by freejazz 1y ago
The settlement isn't even for anything they actually used. An insane blunder by Anthropic. Given it's not data they trained on, I'm not sure the principles behind punishing them further. This article misses this crucial detai
615.
by freejazz 1y ago
One thing to lack taste, but awareness? woof.
616.
by freejazz 1y ago
No one missed that.
617.
by freejazz 1y ago
As a jew (it's a shame I need to admit this in order to get through your dishonest screening), he's talking about zionists, not jews.
618.
by freejazz 1y ago
>Least you could do is look up what an unfamiliar term means before rolling in with all the hot takes. Thanks for proving my point that common sense ain't so common. To be clear, common sense reasoning is not an "unfamiliar ter
619.
by freejazz 1y ago
Nothing about the uncertainty of the definition for 'reasoning' requires that pattern matching be part of the definition.
620.
by freejazz 1y ago
So, you don't, but wikipedia does? I'll believe they can do commonsense reasoning when they can figure out that people have 4 fingers and 1 thumb. Here I was thinking common sense reasoning was what we call reasoning based on comm
621.
by freejazz 1y ago
Do you?
622.
by freejazz 1y ago
Because the other poster's point wasn't that it was a 'past event.' The point was that it's just predicting based upon the previous token . It's disingenuous to mix the two concepts up.
623.
by freejazz 1y ago
This is unhelpfully obtuse
624.
by freejazz 1y ago
I haven't seen LLMs perform common sense reasoning. Feel free to share some links. Your post reads like anthropomorphized nonsense.
625.
by freejazz 1y ago
It seems readily apparent there is a difference given their inability to do tasks we would otherwise reasonably describe as achievable via basic reasoning on the same facts.
626.
by freejazz 1y ago
Lol not everything is a coordinated effort to discount your opinion
627.
by freejazz 1y ago
Really? There's probably a dozen or so well written books in the past year or two calling our current system neo-feudalism.
628.
by freejazz 1y ago
Yawn.
629.
by freejazz 1y ago
What even is the internet anymore? Do you mean the thing people use to access Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and "X"?
630.
by freejazz 1y ago
Thank you, I do not have a "reasoning" LLM and I have not found LLMs very useful in my life so I do not really engage with them outside of reading about them here and in other places.

More ›