Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
freejazz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
391.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
>Advertising is just companies saying "This is what you can purchase from me - it's awesome - please consider purchasing it". I have managed hundreds of millions in ad spend for major brands Oh, okay. Well if you say so.
392.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
>The earlier ones hit a crane which one could argue was an edge case as a temporary structure. I would expect them not to fly into any kind of structure. That they'd hit a crane is pretty insane considering what the results of somet
393.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
When a computer programmer finally discovers English.
394.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
>This sounds like YouTube taking actual steps to improve the situation. Maybe if they actually did any of those things...
395.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Well if we had your way, you'd just be reading the public domain book instead. >If someone would be free to create the thing without copyright duress, it is better even if delayed, because it was done with the least restriction of f
396.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Dishonest man dishonestly asks why someone else would be "dishonest"
397.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Your claim isn't supported either. > People create things all the time under such liberal conditions as public domain And people are free to, even under the duress of copyright. What's the problem there? What was the last movie
398.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
>We often only get the thing for a limited time period after it is lost forever because copyright has prevented the thing from being archived. That's not inherent to copyright, though copyright does grant the author the power to con
399.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
The thing, which would have not been created otherwise. Why pretend like you didn't know that?
400.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
>I mean, the example you link is probably an engineer doing their job of signalling to hierarchy that something went deeply wrong. and? is that not evidence?
401.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
That wasn't a punishment, that was a reward.
402.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Scams all the way up. Scams all the way down.
403.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
You just seem incredibly argumentative and unreasonable and do not seem to care about "this appalling crime" at all.
404.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Who is going to generate kiddie porn on it in the first place? It's not as if a a lack of a credit card is preventing the authorities from figuring anything out. This is beyond ridiculous.
405.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Kiddie porn but only for the paying accounts!
406.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
So aggressive and rude, and over... CSAM? Weird.
407.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Where do these people come from???
408.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
In the US, you can only copyright expressions made by humans. Which part of it do you have trouble with?
409.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
AI-generated code is not copyrightable and therefore cannot be protected through a conventional licensing scheme.
410.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Found the annoying kid in my lawschool class
411.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Have you heard of Eric Adams?
412.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Are you familiar with the term "common sense"? They say it ain't so common
413.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
"Can" isn't the same as "is"
414.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Prima facie negligence = liability
415.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
This isn't a legal argument and these conversations are so tiring because everyone here is insistent upon drawing legal conclusions from these nonsense conversations.
416.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
The burden of substantiating a defense is upon the defendant and no one else.
417.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
What a stupid article from someone that has no idea when liability attaches. It is the burden of a defendant to establish their defense. A defendant can't just say "I didn't do it". They need to show they did not do it.
418.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
> were not previously possible? How obtuse. The poster is saying they don't enable anything of value.
419.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Just a big assumption on your part when the more reasonable conclusion was just that it was not working and it was not a 5 second thing (hence why receipts were taking so long, etc).
420.
▲
by
freejazz
9mo ago
Automated checkout cashier except that you need a human to verify the work of the automated checkout cashier. Brilliant.
More ›