freejazz

12 ms·

301.
by freejazz 7mo ago
So it's just a coincidence that they can't edit user records? They can't get another agent to fix that, even?
302.
by freejazz 7mo ago
That's called ear training and it's crucial. I don't think all ways one can play and call it "practice" are equal
303.
by freejazz 7mo ago
What a bizarre conclusion
304.
by freejazz 7mo ago
If it is a regular practice of such doctors to use such tools, and that doctor did not, then it is malpractice. That is how malpractice works. You have to fall below the standard of care in a way that proximately caused the damages.
305.
by freejazz 7mo ago
>If hospitals are so concerned about cutting costs, getting sued is probably worse. That hasn't stopped them any other time they cut costs. Have you ever spoken to a nurse who works in a hospital?
306.
by freejazz 7mo ago
>While 10 is arbitrary, I like it because it is much closer to balancing incentive for creativity vs stifling creativity. You're the one avoiding discussion by just declaring this is true
307.
by freejazz 7mo ago
Can anyone point to any instance of anyone benefitting from the information conveyed in these prediction markets?
308.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>I haven't read the rest of the thread, I respond from my comment history, so if people are writing the same thing, maybe there's some truth to it Could be. Could be something else. >where many people can't chat with ea
309.
by freejazz 8mo ago
They need to hire a sufficient amount of human monitors, I don't think it's that complicated at all. And people have to spend that energy because Roblox keeps connecting children with pedophiles. > All while despite the legal l
310.
by freejazz 8mo ago
But they were sued for what had already happened, not what would happen...
311.
by freejazz 8mo ago
> There isn't any similarly concrete evidence to claim that Roblox directly facilitates links between child sexual abusers and children, so the difference between opinion and fact from that side of the argument is moot You're k
312.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>If being more open and public correlates strongly enough with "links pedophiles with children", then yeah, true. I expect Roblox to do plenty to improve its platform safety with their track record. The recent introduction of t
313.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>The problem is that the external platforms that the children progress to generally have much laxer protection systems than Roblox does, and thus end up more vulnerable. So? Discord is a problem too. But they aren't finding the kids
314.
by freejazz 8mo ago
Roblox connects them in the first place, what does it matter that it progresses outside of Roblox? That would necessarily be the case if they were to ever meet IRL anyway. Oh it's difficult for Roblox? A $42billion company? Whose entir
315.
by freejazz 8mo ago
So you're saying that if you worked there you would also steal the social security data? What am I supposed to be taking away from this besides the fact that you would make poor choices and lack ethics? Didn't seem like it was a p
316.
by freejazz 8mo ago
How would you get it in the first place?
317.
by freejazz 8mo ago
Crazy that of all places someone here will say that the volume has nothing to do with the platform? The entire point of the platform is its size. The entire point of the tech industry is its size...
318.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>I run a studio that makes Roblox experiences and this is Discord's problem Not really if Roblox is the one connecting the pedos and kids in the first place and I don't see how that is remotely controversial.
319.
by freejazz 8mo ago
> Broadly, this is Discord's problem, not Roblox's. I strongly disagree with that.
320.
by freejazz 8mo ago
People? There's a guy upthread quoting the Anthropic CEO on how they view the value of increasing training against the offset of the entirety of the $35T worldwide labor market... It's not "people". It's the salesme
321.
by freejazz 8mo ago
> The world labor market is ~35T USD yearly, and so that is roughly the order of magnitude to balance against frontier model training cost. Crazy that people can write sentences like this with a straight face these days.
322.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>Yes "deduced" makes more sense, though I guess the code was not really the point. I really should have said the backend functionality is being reproduced. As copyright doesn't protect functionality, the closest proxy we h
323.
by freejazz 8mo ago
Then you're not thinking very hard when this thread is full of people saying "I'm deleting my OpenAI account RIGHT NOW " Which isn't a surprise because you are also buying this hook, line and sinker.
324.
by freejazz 8mo ago
"which they clearly intend to if you've read the memo" Do memos have special magic properties or something? What am I missing here?
325.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>Regardless, I think if you are thinking purely from a ruthless business standpoint then standing up to the DoD was an incredibly ill-advised move. It wasn't, there's been non-stop talk here for days about how Anthropic is a st
326.
by freejazz 8mo ago
A lot of words to say nonsense
327.
by freejazz 8mo ago
>Also this comment where backend code could be reproduced wholesale from the APIs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47259485 Do you mean deduced instead of reproduced? >Agreed, but as we're finding out, every
328.
by freejazz 8mo ago
I'm not talking about employees, I'm talking about the CEO. The fact that employees believe it means the marketing works. Everything about your posts makes my point. Anthropic is a business and that you believe they have a serious
329.
by freejazz 8mo ago
> So in theory (IANAL), investors can't easily bully Anthropic into abandoning their mission statement unless they can convince a court that Anthropic deliberately aimed to prioritize the cause over profit. So why were they ever wor
330.
by freejazz 8mo ago
For what it's worth (to you), I've only ever dealt with one in-house litigation team and they were monsters. Typically, once a suit is filed, you get someone serious on it. It'd be pretty crazy to have a non-litigator draft r

More ›