Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fredsir
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
61.
▲
From Managerial Feudalism to the Revolt of the Caring Classes [video]
(media.ccc.de)
4 points
by
fredsir
7y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Ideally you wouldn't have to be creating something you don't care about at your day job at 40-60/h/w, but instead could spend all your creative time on something you really care about, and doing it to benefit you and you
63.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Pobody’s nerfect, but you can improve.
64.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Why do you eat octopus if you feel bad about it? Why not just don't do it? It's not like you need to for survival.
65.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
> Inherently it’s no less ethical for us to eat them than it is for them to eat fish Ignoring the farming and catching practices used to get most octopuses from the sea to the plate, which most certainly are unethical since they are unne
66.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I was vague, but I think I just meant VPN. Dunny why I wrote proxying. Thank you!
67.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Does Turris Omnia support VPN proxying?
68.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Block it, then.
69.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
If I was gathering your stuff without permission, it’s stealing. If a bear or a person not part of society does it, it’s not stealing, it’s gathering. The myths of society are only that: collective beliefs inside society.
70.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Insignificant detail.
71.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Sure. Point being it’s all gathering. No difference when you gather berries or other peoples stuff against their will.
72.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
So it's not gathering when we pick berries because the plant prepared them for spreading its seeds, not for us to eat and end up in our trash. Or we take the tree where the bird nested in, or the beetle, or the abe? Or when we take wha
73.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I ask because the one I asked seems to believe break ins and theft is anything but collective myths existing only because the individuals in our society believe in them. Outside of society, where nature and war takes place, none of those th
74.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Aren't we also breaking in and stealing other, not people, but livings things "stuff" when we mow down their home, destroy their supplies, and then kill them off completely? Is it really a "break in" and "theft
75.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Finding materials in nature (e.g. an untouched-by-humans forrest) vs in society (e.g. someones cabin) is not much of a difference if you are not a part of society. All living things need food and other stuff to sustain its life. You go out,
76.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I just don’t like that many carrots. Would prefer to be able to buy the couple I want. And yes, I do eat plenty of vegetables. I follow a whole-food plant-based diet and have done so for almost 7 years.
77.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
> As well, going to the store more often. Buying only a couple or three days worth of groceries makes it easy to lower food waste. When I try to buy over a weeks worth of groceries I find myself having to throw away things more often. Ex
78.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
For the consumer or the seller? I think I easily save 20-50% when I buy the amount I can eat before it goes bad instead of having to buy a larger amount because it's prepackaged in a too-big-for-me package. Come to think of it, I never
79.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I was the same before. I could get myself to sit down with a book and read, and wanted to, very much actually, but could only stomach it for 15-20 minutes. Then I was looking for the next dopamine fix. And not every day. It was a bit boring
80.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
They lived in harmony with nature in every realistic meaning of the term. Being dragged away as somethings dinner, sleeping with one eye open, sometimes going to bed hungry, and so on, is part of natures harmony. That's how it works ev
81.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
> What about the countries you're shipping your plastic waste to Or ordering from. Their pollution is funded by you.
82.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
That was a lot more than I expected! Thank you very much! I'll take the dive in later!
83.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
That's a Snowden quote, isn't it?
84.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
So do you have any recommendations for specific stuff to read for the rest of us... Pretty please? :)
85.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
> Ok, but if your experiences are objectively wrong compared to our shared reality, "we" can make value judgements in the context of our shared reality as to whether the behaviors based on your objective experiences are rationa
86.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
And I’d argue that rationale depends entirely on how you react to your experiences. Your experiences can be objectively wrong compared to our shared reality, but true to your internal reality, and if you behave rationally according to your
87.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying rational depends on perspective. For a person with mental illness, it might be rational the way they act because their brain for example works differently, they experience things differently, and from
88.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
Are you really in a position to declare that that was not the case? Do you posses all evidence, or is there actually a chance that there are things about the situation that you don’t know? Also he was mentally ill, his brain worked differen
89.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I think there is a distinction. Rational/irrational is a relative form. It depends on perspective. For people that are wired like most other people, irrational behavior is ... irrational, but if you are wired completely differently me
90.
▲
by
fredsir
7y ago
I think the point was that he, contrary to what you claim, wasn’t a good reminder because he wasn’t irrational, which you implied.
More ›