frasierman

6 ms·

1.
by frasierman 13y ago
Threw together a quick script to check if you're affected... http://robbiet.us/snapchat/
2.
by frasierman 13y ago
Different guy. (Source: I'm the guy who "hacked" Vine [@ws])
3.
by frasierman 13y ago
The question I'd like to pose (and it's something I have a hard time with answering myself): Would you prefer that the government watches your Google searches, your forum postings, your Facebook messages, and your emails and poten
4.
Introducing HockeyCoach(hockeyapp.net)
1 points by frasierman 13y ago|0 comments
5.
by frasierman 13y ago
Just spitballing here, but couldn't you just remove the hardcoded URLs and let users paste in the Snapchat URL so they'd be breaking the TOS, not you? Technically, it wouldn't be utilizing their API, it would just be a PHP li
6.
by frasierman 13y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't this been there for a while? I know classmates who have been mortified when they find out that who they Snapchat with is public.
7.
by frasierman 13y ago
Maybe I'm missing something... if Twilio's going rate is $0.01/message, wouldn't it make better financial sense to sit down and just build this yourself? It's not like it requires a bunch of infrastructure...
8.
by frasierman 13y ago
I'm 55 exactly. (@ws on Twitter). I don't consider myself influential to alot of people, but there are a few.
9.
by frasierman 13y ago
I found it a bit weird that they never asked for my email, they just assumed that my Gmail account was my email.
10.
by frasierman 14y ago
I didn't even think about AWS... someone should put together an article on how to set them up... I'd be happy to launch some instances for the cause
11.
by frasierman 14y ago
I think I saw a comment somewhere about your IP being banned after an hour... anything we should do to avoid this? I'd hate to be scanning for 15 minutes only to be banned and not be able to help anymore.
12.
by frasierman 14y ago
Well, maybe... If the police were to work with the postal service, they could find the originating post office. Then again, they could more or less do this now, and they don't.
13.
by frasierman 14y ago
Thanks! Yeah, I'm not quite sure how to prevent human error without everyone having barcode sticker printers, which seems extremely unlikely.
14.
by frasierman 14y ago
I totally see where you're coming from, but since the system is mostly automated (as far as I can tell), it'd be just as easy for them to grab from a DB than to try and parse out an adress and postage. I didn't really start mailing things u
15.
Rethinking The Postal System(willsmidlein.com)
26 points by frasierman 14y ago|48 comments
16.
Finish, the todo list for procrastinators(getfinish.com)
1 points by frasierman 14y ago|0 comments
17.
by frasierman 14y ago
Followup: Got a response from Name.com... it looks like the only thing they can do in this situation is transfer the domain to next of kin (rather then letting someone else be the billing contact) Hopefully the Swartz estate understands how
18.
by frasierman 14y ago
I've emailed both Linode and Name.com asking if I can pay for his domain and hosting to continue on for eternity. http://d.pr/i/2ysc (and they're looking into it - https://twitter.com/namedotcom/status/290111405410091008 ) http://d.pr/i
19.
by frasierman 14y ago
http://willsmidlein.com/blog/tech-trends/
20.
I’m 13, and this is my first app(willsmidlein.com)
2 points by frasierman 14y ago|1 comments
21.
by frasierman 14y ago
Quick note about CAPTCHAs... A more accurate rate is $1.50 per 1000, and that's even a tad expensive. If you buy in bulk, it's much cheaper. Source: Security researcher.
22.
by frasierman 14y ago
Wow... this looks really awesome! Some ideas: - An iPhone app or web interface - Allow you to upload a photo as a response - Some sort of API to add things like "How many emails did you send?" or "How many Twitter followers did you gain?" -