frankjr

24 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   The one where your potential customers hang out.
2. 332.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   For those curious how it actually looks like when a skilled person uses it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNYpmLH6IjQ
3. 333.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   There is an option to always require 2fa when publishing a package. > To protect your packages, as a package publisher, you can require everyone who has write access to a package to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. This will
4. 334.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   Not including forks should be the default IMO. There can be a button in the Advanced section of the sidebar to include them.
5. 335.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   Did you update to 6.1.66? Sucker! Your data might be safe(r) but your Wi-Fi is not working! The exact same thing happened again ([0] needs [1] but that one was not backported). Fixed in 6.1.67 [2] released this morning. [0] https:/&#x
6. 336.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   `cargo-inspect` is no longer in development and has been superseded by https://github.com/dtolnay/cargo-expand
7. 337.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   6.1.65 is affected as well.
8. 338.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   I think not unless you've explicitly installed the 6.1 series (none of the official supported releases ship with it by default as far as I can tell).
9. 339.▲
   by frankjr 3y ago

   Here's my understanding so far: In the upstream Linux kernel there were two fixes posted months from each other, one for direct io [0] and the other one for ext4 [1]. The ext4 one was marked for backport to stable (CC: stable@vger.kern
10. 340.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    That's just fantastic. And here I was thinking after the recent OpenZFS data loss bug that by staying with the good ol' ext4 I might miss on some nice features but at least it's rock solid.
11. 341.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I'm glad it's not just me. I've given up on bug reporting to Debian on at least ~two occasions because the email sent via reportbug simply wouldn't go through without any indication as to why. Fortunately somebody else w
12. 342.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    There are at least 4 times 20 and 19 reasons why this won't work.
13. 343.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    It would be great if you could use an existing AUR account when logging through the SSO.
14. 344.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I have a Linux box set up with secure boot. I manage my own keys, I sign my UKI kernels. I use TPM2 for disk encryption in addition to requiring password. Where does DRM come into this? Where does Microsoft? I use neither. So no, secure boo
15. 345.▲
    Stanford Lecture: Dr. Don Knuth – Dancing Cells (2023) [video](youtube.com)

    3 points by frankjr 3y ago|0 comments
16. 346.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    > Yet again we're shown that secure boot and TPMs are security theatre designed for DRM and not to protect you, the user. I don't understand how this is not downvoted into oblivion. As others have already pointed out, this is a
17. 347.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I think you've just accidentally demonstrated why most people don't like Lisp syntax.
18. 348.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I used BurntSushi's excelent aho-corasick, which unsurprisingly implements the Aho–Corasick algorithm (overkill I know). It did take me a while to realize though that there are overlaps which meant that my code worked on the example in
19. 349.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    There's an ongoing work on a stress test for this. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15608
20. 350.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    A more "correct" fix has been posted https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15615
21. 351.▲
    Amazon EC2 high memory U7i Instances for large in-memory databases(aws.amazon.com)

    1 points by frankjr 3y ago|0 comments
22. 352.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    More on the motivation behind the rewrite. https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/pull/9512#issuecomm...
23. 353.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    > Microsoft uses Google's framework for their own applications: Electron. Electron is built on top of Google's Chromium but developed by a completely different set of people at GitHub initially for their text editor Atom. Later
24. 354.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    Not sure what's your point. The comment I linked to just confirmed that the bug (whichever it might be) has reproduced on FreeBSD.
25. 355.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526#issuecomment-182...
26. 356.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I mean it could be that the programmer wanted it to be discovered to draw attention to Google managers' shenanigans but that seems kind of far fetched.
27. 357.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    I have a hard time believing that's actually what's happening. If they wanted to slow down other browsers, why would they choose this easily discoverable way? They could have easily slowed down serving of JS files (and other asset
28. 358.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    A genius plan. I'm sure the advertisers will rush back afterwards.
29. 359.▲
    by frankjr 3y ago

    Another way to get something supposedly more stable than wifi when ethernet cabling is not feasible is to use your house's electric wiring and run data through that. There are kits which offer data rates in gigabits (although based on
30. 360.▲
    Framework 13 with AMD Ryzen 7040 Series Makes for a Great Linux Laptop(phoronix.com)

    140 points by frankjr 3y ago|102 comments