fourfaces

5 ms·

1.
by fourfaces 8y ago
OK. See you around.
2.
by fourfaces 8y ago
The inconvenient but amazing truth about deep learning is that, unlike neural networks, the brain does not learn complex patterns. It can see new complex patterns and objects instantly without learning them. Besides, there are not enough ne
3.
by fourfaces 9y ago
Want better pay? Kill the intelligent robots or kill our current forms of capitalism.
4.
by fourfaces 9y ago
What would it cost them to attach a friendly dog head and a wagging tail on this headless monster? It would make it more appealing to the public and improve PR. Imagine thousands of these things walking up and down the sidewalks of NYC. The
5.
by fourfaces 9y ago
The next big thing will be unsupervised spiking neural networks. http://rebelscience.blogspot.com/2017/09/unsupervised-machin...
6.
The World Is Its Own Model or Why Hubert Dreyfus Is Still Right About AI(medium.com)
3 points by fourfaces 9y ago|0 comments
7.
by fourfaces 9y ago
"Nothing" is a stretch. It still has to be told what a bad outcome is.
8.
by fourfaces 9y ago
"a-theism literally means "lack of belief"" This is nonsense, of course. It shows a definite predilection among atheists to deceive themselves and others. Atheism is definitely a belief. But go ahead and believe otherwis
9.
by fourfaces 9y ago
" religion requires faith without evidence, materialism and atheism do not." This is dogma preached by materialists, of course. The fact is that opposites are of the same nature. Theism and its opposite, atheism, are both belief s
10.
by fourfaces 9y ago
Nonsense. Both theism and atheism are belief systems. Neither is scientific.
11.
by fourfaces 9y ago
"When I google "religion", I get: "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods."" Modern atheists came up with that definition. The fact is that opposites are
12.
by fourfaces 9y ago
Materialism, theism and atheism are all religions.
13.
by fourfaces 9y ago
This science of consciousness you speak of is nowhere to be found.
14.
by fourfaces 9y ago
"Classical and operant conditioning are psychological concepts that aren't applicable to non-humans." You're kidding?
15.
by fourfaces 9y ago
We don't need a fire alarm for AGI. The problem is not AGI. Machines will be motivated to do exactly what we tell them to do. It's called classical and operant conditioning. The problem is not AGI for the same reason that the prob
16.
by fourfaces 9y ago
>Humans evolved from immaterial matter to conscious carriers of information. You know this how? Where is the science behind it?
17.
by fourfaces 9y ago
I know where it will not come from. It will not come from the mainstream AI community. They are married to and madly in love with deep learning. Deep learning, the supervised kind, is a red herring. AGI will require a revolutionary breakthr