fortuna86

10 ms·

31.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Like Huawei. China wants them to have a monopoly everywhere on earth. Alibaba had nothing to do with being a monopoly, it became a power base to rival the government so it had to be broken and scattered.
32.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Love the use of the passive tense. "Company decides to become less of a threat to president for life".
33.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Another quote: "wealth always consolidates at the top, you can choose private sector or government to do so."
34.
by fortuna86 4y ago
China's public debt exceeds the US in several areas, private debt lags behind but is still substantial.
35.
by fortuna86 4y ago
I don't know but that's not relevant to my point..
36.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Right wing high engagement accounts. Through in one or two accounts like @AOC for "balance"
37.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> but instead we have an electronic voting system We don't. As said, every electronic vote has a physical backup that is audited.
38.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Ok, a global wikipedia article. Is there any example in the US of fraud existing at a scale that once audited could have changed the outcome on an election?
39.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> Over what period? At least 2-3 years, anything less is too small a sample size. You could be highlighting a 10% decline after a 200% increase.
40.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Fair points, sorry for creating more work for you.
41.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Right, the frat party I went to was sponsored by Microsoft and had Xbox stations. Different.
42.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> property prices and rental yields are extremely precarious I noticed you didn't say "declining" because that wouldn't be true.
43.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> Stanford is a leading indicator of campus life elsewhere. It very much is not. Last party I went to at Stanford had corporate sponsorship.
44.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> I thought there was evidence of fraud in 2020, but the problem was that the "evidence" was bogus This is a distinction without a difference, no?
45.
by fortuna86 4y ago
With all due respect, i'm calmly pointing out another users' inflammatory comments and clear trolling. I wasn't overly polite to him, is the rule literally to take abuse and remain robotic in response? Not being cheeky, genu
46.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> I really would like an explanation of what audit means. I am open to the idea of being surprised by a satisfying answer, but I am also asking because I don't think the answer will be satisfying. Every electronic vote has a physica
47.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> Self-awareness is not your strong point It's funny how i've said everything I need to say already. You aren't as complicated as you think you are.
48.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> I didn't ask who you claim to be, i'm pointing out what you are.
49.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> I'm having a lot of fun, actually. I don't doubt that. Trolling is fun for lots of people.
50.
by fortuna86 4y ago
"Your sources are compromised, here's a quote from Fidel Castro and a random blog titled "China Has Billionaires" that doesn't actually talk about China at all, just "US is bad China opposes US therefore...&quo
51.
by fortuna86 4y ago
I didn't ask who you claim to be, i'm pointing out what you are. If you actually care what China is, which it appears you don't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_capitalism
52.
by fortuna86 4y ago
If I understand correctly, neither point has to do with electronic voting.
53.
by fortuna86 4y ago
I disagree. There was no evidence of fraud in 2020, yet the losing party at 80-90% rate still believes it was stolen. At that point, there's nothing that can be done to dissuade.
54.
by fortuna86 4y ago
To be clear, Trump attempted a coup based on no evidence of fraud. What would preventing him from doing the same, no matter how elections are run? Hell he declared the elections fraudulent before they happened. What can possibly be done to
55.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Most electronic ballots still carry paper or otherwise physical verification.
56.
by fortuna86 4y ago
I don't believe anyone is saying that. Reasonable objection is fine. However the reductio ad absurdum tactic you employ to dismiss pointing out actual problematic behavior is typical of trolling itself. My opinion? I don't think t
57.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Your account was created 15 days ago and is used exclusively for posting inflammatory political nonsense. Also, you do realize that China is the most hyper-capitalist country in the world, don't you?
58.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> Are you citing the Chinese government as the best source on supposed Chinese government atrocities? > Absolutely. He's telling you what he is. If you continue to engage, it's on you.
59.
by fortuna86 4y ago
> It's plausible since there are claims that covid was detected in the US months before covid spread in Wuhan. Not credible ones. In fact, the only people to bring this up are Chinese state media.
60.
by fortuna86 4y ago
Even so, from late December to 23rd January is a long time to still allow dozens of international flights everyday from Wuhan. Incompetence is ruled out because domestic flights were suspended right away.

More ›