forefeather

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by forefeather 12y ago

   Doctor Pennington? I really like the paper, as I said "This is really interesting work and a good paper.", but disagree that "troublesome" would be too strong. The original version claimed 11% improvement, Professor Gold
2. 2.▲
   by forefeather 12y ago

   I was not aware of these updates and will have to read the new version. It is great that it is possible for non reviewer feedback to have such an impact on a paper before it is published and presented. Was the camera ready version also chan
3. 3.▲
   by forefeather 12y ago

   This is really interesting work and a good paper. But, it should also be mentioned that some concerns have been raised about the evaluation. As troublesome as it is, it is a common problem with word representation papers since there is not