forcry

12 ms·

91.
by forcry 5y ago
> allowed to frighten people. No, no. They call it "awareness"..
92.
by forcry 5y ago
> tell you to your face that Wikipedia isn't facts It is not. Why do you think so? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0P4Cf0UCwU
93.
by forcry 5y ago
>Historically pandemics were finished through compulsory vaccination, lockdowns and quarantines controlled through force Please provide a list of such pandemics.
94.
by forcry 5y ago
I mean, does not imply..
95.
by forcry 5y ago
>So, as current vaccines don't stop infection and spread, why would the most of the population whose risk of hospitalization is very low need (and even forced) to vaccinate? Good point.
96.
by forcry 5y ago
> worrying that a human with a horse's head might be born anytime soon. But is there any advantage for a human to have a horse's head? I don't think. So it appears to be a very flawed analogy, on multiple levels. Also you
97.
by forcry 5y ago
But the implication appear to be the virus is unlikely to get there, because of low rate of mutation. Which appear to be a very weak counter argument.. To my untrained eye, it also seem that mutations are not a straight road, but an open sp
98.
by forcry 5y ago
Yes, of course, but not being able to do the proper minimum viable thing 'x', does imply the possible alternative is good enough.. Also I was mostly talking about correcting errors in existing data..
99.
by forcry 5y ago
> The stupid is winning. Calling someone stupid just because they do not share your blind trust in a bunch of people is kind of malicious.
100.
by forcry 5y ago
>I wouldn't trust any method of fixing errors in data collection. You need to redo data collection and perform a proper case-control study. Climate research would like to have a word with you.
101.
by forcry 5y ago
> fully vaccinated people who get infected carry as much of the virus in their nose as unvaccinated people. It would be interesting to see how this was measured. If true, it appears to go against the earlier claims..
102.
by forcry 5y ago
>So for every hundred people dying from COVID, 99 are missed? No. You got it wrong. For every hundred people that were previously being mislabeled as covid deaths, but now correctly being labeld as "not-covid" deaths, if they h
103.
by forcry 5y ago
>How is this different from any other behavior? Other behaviour does not cost any business money. People being obese makes businesses money, so why would they fund propoganda to stop it? Leave obesity, what about water pollution? Do we s
104.
by forcry 5y ago
This is mostly about doing mass vaccinations in the middle of a pandemic with vaccines that are not very effective in preventing infection (and also requiring two spaced out doses). Apparently it provides ample opportunities for the virus t
105.
by forcry 5y ago
>All but 43 were unvaccinated people." Do you have any evidence that there is no bias in attributing death to Covid, when the person in vaccinated? We already know that many Covid deaths are merely co-incidental. If this aspect is r
106.
by forcry 5y ago
>On the other side, there is the right to protection of health. Please explain this right? What exactly is it? So by this right, can I demand pills for my disease free of cost?
107.
by forcry 5y ago
To be frank, I demanded the numbers because you claimed to have it. If you don't have it, it is fine.
108.
by forcry 5y ago
May be they should help these people instead https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8
109.
by forcry 5y ago
> Because sufficient evidence is now available in hard numerical statistics. Can you show me the exact number of adverse events observed after, say pfizer covid vaccine, in real world use? Can you show me the exact number of breakthrough
110.
by forcry 5y ago
It is dishonest to frame the argument in this way. A better way to see vaccine mandates is that it will remove one of the fundamental checks and measures from capitalism that ensures the consumer get a quality product. If a product become m
111.
by forcry 5y ago
This is a point that need more exposure.
112.
by forcry 5y ago
>As far as I can tell there is no reasonable justification for an individual not to get vaccinated How about, I don't trust the vaccine research? You can expect rational people to trust science (which is essentially trusting nature
113.
by forcry 5y ago
>And it's incredibly harmless Not really https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8 Ofcourse these may be a small number of cases. But you can't see these people, and say that the vaccine is "incredibly h
114.
by forcry 5y ago
Regarding safety, actually no. The measures in place to capture safety data are virtualy useless, depends on self reporting, not widely known etc.. Also https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/defining-away-vaccin... N
115.
by forcry 5y ago
>I have no problem with society applying a bit of societal pressure on people to get vaccinated voluntarily. The problem is that you are essentially imposing your trust in the institutions, onto others. Trust in "science" is fu
116.
by forcry 5y ago
> accepting that many things which affect you every day are outside of your control and will be decided by someone else. Ok, so it is not ideal right now, but we should try to move towards the ideal, instead of away from it.
117.
by forcry 5y ago
I want the freedom to evaluate a product from what I see around me, and decide if I should use it. It is quite simple. If it is beyond me to evaluate the product, I would look at people who are capable that I trust , to evaluate it for me.
118.
by forcry 5y ago
Sure, so apparently efficacy matters. An 80% efficacy may be good enough for you to take the vaccine. But for someone they might be looking for 95% efficacy to make it worthwhile for them. But in no circumstance, I should be able to dictate
119.
by forcry 5y ago
>then you must equally accept that everything you eat is a risk. I do. That is why I am not going to dictate what you should eat, and why I think that will be very wrong.
120.
by forcry 5y ago
>Ultimately when enough of the population is vaccinated, you’d expect the majority of hospitalizations to be vaccinated. So apparently, vaccines can never fail, by definition!

More ›