forcry

13 ms·

121.
by forcry 5y ago
> since vaccinated people can still get sick. Then may be you should complain to people who gave you the vaccine, instead of pushing others to take this thing that apparently does not work as advertised.
122.
by forcry 5y ago
> Unvaccinated people are literally like drunks. There are a number of assumptions underlying this perception. And under each of these assumptions, there is some information that you base on trust on some entities. And if you vary this t
123.
by forcry 5y ago
> vaccine material There is no single "vaccine material" and pretending there is this single magic completely disappearing thing in all vaccines is disingenuous at best. Also, just because something disappear from the body does
124.
by forcry 5y ago
> When and about what has it been crying wolf? I can give you instances, but that would not be very efficient. Because you can then be apologetic of the examples I provide.. The real question is "can the scientific community be made
125.
by forcry 5y ago
Just because you trust a bunch of people does not mean that you can force others to trust the same. There is nothing "stupid" about not allowing that. It is just common sense.
126.
by forcry 5y ago
>When has the scientific community really been crying wolf on environmental matters, on a large scale? Obviously I meant the scientific community in general. What is special about the "environmental matters", that make the comm
127.
by forcry 5y ago
I mean, there is also the issue regarding the emails... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3F2ZJGipiE
128.
by forcry 5y ago
> “how do we make a big portion of the world aware of the seriousness?” A big portion of the world is pretty convinced that scientific community is full of shit. It might be the case that what they are saying might be true. But it is the
129.
by forcry 5y ago
>establishment of this indemnity was a brilliant public health move. That basically removed one of the fundamental checks and measures in a capitalistic system to ensure that consumers get a quality product, and replace it with regulatio
130.
by forcry 5y ago
>So they can focus in continue saving millions of lives since December Not sure. Are the researchers working on the vaccine are the one handling the claims? I mean, whats this thing about "focusing on saving lives" got to do wi
131.
by forcry 5y ago
> Scientists and engineers make really bad politicians though; they tend to say what they believe to be true. A very dangerous statement to generalise. Because it implies that someone with a political aptitude is incapable of these trade
132.
Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals(roundingtheearth.substack.com)
2 points by forcry 5y ago|0 comments
133.
by forcry 5y ago
>To do that, you need a very sensitive test, not something that only confirms symptomatic infection. Now, that makes sense. But you have also take into account that these are not just numbers. But these are numbers that can destroy count
134.
by forcry 5y ago
I am not sure I like someone vocalising CDCs thought. It is kind of disturbing. I mean, you can be cutting someone throat and saying "be quite my child, it is all for best".. anyway here is what I have responded to a similar comme
135.
by forcry 5y ago
It is not misinformation. This is the actual document that provides guidelines to labs to assess breakthrough infections https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-... but it is no longer ava
136.
by forcry 5y ago
>Regardless of number of cases, most of us will be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 eventually. If the no of cases is nearly zero, that means the virus is no longer dangerous, so it does not really matter at that point.
137.
by forcry 5y ago
Please cite studies with randomised control trials to justify these claims.
138.
by forcry 5y ago
>The only metric the public should be concerned about is whether they have or have not been vaccinated. That would be quite stupid. Because if the risk of the disease is low, vaccines does not make sense when you do risk/benefit cal
139.
by forcry 5y ago
>Two is routinely enough to issue one of those "might"s Sure. "Might" is is a mighty word. A great many things can be accomplished by the appropriate placement of "might"s.
140.
by forcry 5y ago
That CDC don't want real safety data is pretty clear by how VAERS system is set up. I mean, they could just mandate, I mean, strictly, to report any and all AEFI observed or reported. But even after decades of setting it up, it is not
141.
by forcry 5y ago
That is like saying if smoking caused cancer, all smokers will be dying of lung cancer. But since we don't see it, so it couldn't be.
142.
by forcry 5y ago
>they look for either a mechanism that links the potential cause and observed effect, or for a large enough number to get statistical confidence From the article. >An analysis of penile tissue from two men receiving penile implants sh
143.
by forcry 5y ago
The most baffling thing is not standardising CT values for RT-PCR tests. I have looked and I cannot even find how increasing CT values affect the false positive rate for the PCR testing. If my understanding is correct a single increment of
144.
by forcry 5y ago
We just don't consider "correlation =/= causation" when we are pushing vaccines!
145.
by forcry 5y ago
>There is no real evidence that SARS-CoV-2 originated from a lab leak. Rand Paul is being intentionally distracting to push a false narrative. Despite that, I think lying before public should he held accountable. Particularly when the pe
146.
by forcry 5y ago
> it wasn't because of gain of function research. May be. But they were doing GoF (even going by your statement above), which was the question being asked.
147.
by forcry 5y ago
Basically, the point and the whole point I am making is the issue being how Faucci uses appeals to authority, instead of answering or explaining how it is NOT gain of function. I am quite surprised that he gets away with it in a public hea
148.
by forcry 5y ago
Did you take the cookie? No But there is one less in the jar? My friends up and down the road have looked in the jar and have assured that no cookie was taken. But there is one less in the jar? You have no idea what you are talking about pa
149.
by forcry 5y ago
Science didn't lose trust. Men who claim to do science lost it. They shouldn't have had it in the first place actually.
150.
by forcry 5y ago
I mean, I think there are no RCTs done for supporting the following claims. 1. That vaccines will reduce transmission, even when it does not prevent infection. 2. That vaccines will reduce hospitalisations even when it does not prevent infe

More ›