Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
foohbarbaz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
The root of the problem here is that 1. A lot (most) people do not have any security enabled on their PCs (logged in as admin at all times) 2. Majority of software installs require admin privileges by default. Of course, the guilty party he
32.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Uhm... No. Not then and not today.
33.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Do I read this right? Is somebody suggesting teaching kernel to read some stupid shit MS "PE binaries"!? Go, Linus. Let kernel NOT even boot on these secure boot machines, see who runs back crying first. Dells and HPs of the world are alrea
34.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Meh. Let this kill the default Java install on Windows. When I need to deliver an app written in Java to the end user I just include my own JRE. You have to do it pretty much anyway in order to guarantee that your app works regardless of qu
35.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
DNS tunneling is only good in theory. Ah, good old days. There was time (2003?) when I had a T-Mobile phone with GPRS and an IR port. I connected it to my laptop and discovered DNS lookups worked. Downloaded DNS tunnel sources, compiled an
36.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Nothing easier than Linux. 1. Download zip archive 2. Install into $HOME. 3. Switch symlink from old version to new. Done. I have 3 different JDKs installed at the moment.
37.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Sandboxing in JVM is broken. Server code does not rely on that (most of the time). Sandboxing is inherently insecure. It usually comes with appropriate warnings (ex: Python) and everybody is expected to understand that it is a half measure
38.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
That's pretty silly. Why?
39.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
This has nothing to do with Java. It's a browser plugin issue. Disable the plugin and forget.
40.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
JVM is pretty much the only platform, unless you want to be Windows-only. This however has absolutely nothing to do with Java browser plugin. The sooner that thing dies the better. Just disable the "Java plugin" in the browser and forget ab
41.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
No, it does not. This is non-news. Agreed, nobody uses that anymore, nobody should.
42.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
The only way I am going to see Windows 8 is with a new PC (which is a few years away, next purchase is probably an Apple product), or at work. At work the IT dept will hopefully skip this version all together, or take a few years before "ap
43.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Oh come on! I am in mid-forties and not just did not have any problems getting interviews, but also did not have any problems switching jobs a few months ago. Where I work we can't find enough decent devs for any money. H1-B is just a memor
44.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
In a sense none of the "JVM languages" are affected: apparently it's a bug in the Web applets sandbox implementation. It's not something used by standalone Java (or whatever) programs. It only matters if you are running Java applets off a w
45.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
14y ago
Another browser plugin hole? Yawn. It's disabled in Firefox and Chrome anyway. Let them disable it for good and enable by exception. Who uses Java in browser anyway? WebEx and some weird VPN solutions?
46.
▲
by
foohbarbaz
15y ago
Has anybody seen like real people buying Windows phones? Meh. Zune.