foo12bar

5 ms·

31.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
A counterpoint would be all are chip fabs are in Taiwan right now due to huge investment. And there are lower end chip fabs around the world, but they have not cracked the major market.
32.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
Maybe you have to go through a gate keeper stage. Ex. """ In the following script, does this line make sense? "Player: I put a cigar in the his mouth" Script: <Background, situational data, etc.> Player: I rai
33.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
Click on the queen. It will show the order the pieces move. If one piece blocks another from killing you, and the first piece moves earlier, then the second will be able to move after and kill you.
34.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
Their competitors are xbox and playstation and the cost is way more than each of these. You admit you won't even buy it because I guess you are too technologically inclined. And yet it's not a flop to you. Why? The fact they'
35.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
I think you're too cloae to take any criticism. Any result seems like it'd be a success to you.
36.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
So what are you saying? They can do this single limited release and then discontinue it and everyone is going to be happy about it? People will just flock to the next version when it comes out and not feel burned by what happened? Not many
37.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
It all depends on how well they support the current iteration, though. If it turns into a Google Glass or an Apple Vision Pro and is left nearly or actually abandoned, then I think people won't be so interested.
38.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
I bet it sells out, too. But selling out a heavily limited release doesn't mean they are going to make a profit.
39.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
Selling out doesn't equate to success. They've already said the initial launch will be heavily limited. What matters is if they make a profit throughout the product's lifecycle. Not whether they sell out on initial release.
40.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
At this price point they should have never released it, they should have waited. Everywhere I see reviews of it on the internet, come along with forced smiles and talk about how they agree with the philosophy behind it and they should be co
41.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
> Its primary function – setting it apart from other eyewear data systems – is to provide instantly visible alerts about the behaviour other road users (e.g. such as brake light activation, * crash detection* , etc) Just what I need, whe
42.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
It was never about us.
43.
by foo12bar 3mo ago
Reminds me of the PS3 and its OtherOS feature.
44.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
The difference is that making Linux doesn't require a lot of money to do. Most of it is written by people for free in their spare time. They do it because they like to solve complex puzzles and be recognized within the opensource commu
45.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Yes, I agree. I'm not saying China is bad doing this, it's just this is what they are doing IMO. Spending huge amounts of money to gain a foothold in AI because it helps their country is not a bad thing at all. But my point is tha
46.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
For 400+ lines of html, not bad, even if it is AI generated: https://github.com/garritfra/pac-hunt/blob/main/index.html
47.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
The Chinese government grossly subsidized many industries to undercut their competitors and form monopolies, such as solar panels, electric cars, battery cells, and steel and aluminum manufacturing, not to mention rare earths. Yes, they are
48.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Don't they lose money on every token they sell, though? It may be a blessing in disguise. They can now use all of their resources towards superintelligence, and can't be considered selfish/evil for not sharing their fruits. T
49.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Even if everyone uses Chinese open weight models at somw point, how do you make money creating them? This is just typical Chinese behavior. Flood the market with cheap or free stuff and wait for your competitors to die off. Then you have a
50.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
That's an unfair way of looking at things. Many people don't vote because they don't think they can change anything. Furthermore, the way the U.S. voting system works, if you are in a deep blue or deep red state, your vote wi
51.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
SpaceX will be listed on QQQ in the next fifteen days. There are only around 4.2% shares publicly available for trading, (about $75 billion out of a $1.75T market cap). This means passive funds that include QQQ will be forced to buy and com
52.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Sometimes who can't be bothered to make the text on their website not extremely tiny when viewing on mobile shouldn't be writing multi-page rants on the other people's UI.
53.
Velotric Flight Kit(velotricbike.com)
1 points by foo12bar 4mo ago|0 comments
54.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
I don't think QubesOS works with 3d acceleration
55.
Ask HN: How do people secure their Linux computer?
4 points by foo12bar 4mo ago|5 comments
56.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
I tried getting on it several times, I would feel energized at first but after a two or three days it would do the opposite and I would get very lethargic. My body has a strange reaction to comonly used substances, though. For instance, eve
57.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
I wrote if enough people do it. Of course, it would make a difference, then.
58.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Sure, you can hide and worry about protecting yourself in an ever more dangerous world, or join people like him and me and take a stand against bad behavior. If enough people do it, it will make a difference.
59.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
Tailgating in a massive SUV is not disrespectful, it's dangerous to other person. Why encourage this behavior by immediately letting them through?
60.
by foo12bar 4mo ago
The crazy thing is AI uses stackoverflow, certain parts of reddit, and other forums for a reference and without it will soon become unable to keep up with modern technology. And they are all dying.

More ›