fogetti

18 ms·

151.
by fogetti 7y ago
I am hesitant to write this, because in general I agree, but let's say a product manager stops a feature short of completed in some sense, even though there are some aspects which would make the feature more robust, secure or optimized
152.
by fogetti 7y ago
> For example if we predicted how likely a vegetarian is to purchase bacon, Aito could return that it is very likely, because based on data, that's the common average. Why is this a good thing??? Maybe it's just me who doesn&#x
153.
by fogetti 7y ago
OK, so this will all be anecdotal. But what I am describing is not that uncommon. And I only worked for a very short time in the US. So if you plan to stay in the US for your whole working life than this advice might not even apply to you a
154.
by fogetti 7y ago
The problem with your argument is: what if the organization doesn't support anyone in learning? (Just like 99% of companies and society in large) Would you say then that you are a low performer? Because based on your argument that&#x27
155.
by fogetti 7y ago
Sorry, but this is gonna be a kind of rant, so it's very subjective and highly anecdotal. But the post is also very subjective and highly anecdotal so meh I guess. So what I want to say is that I've worked with this kind of person
156.
by fogetti 7y ago
I am sorry to play the devil's advocate but aren't you one of those with their own agenda's too? It's just matter of perspective how to judge yourself vs others, and putting yourself into the `good guys` camp seems biase
157.
by fogetti 7y ago
> “But I’m not a shareholder!” A surprising amount of Americans are shareholders in large financial institutions. Do you have an IRA? Does it invest in e.g. mutual funds? If you own a mutual fund or index fund, you are highly likely to b
158.
A Critical Analysis of the Design Sprint's Argumentation(kevinrichard.ch)
1 points by fogetti 7y ago|0 comments
159.
by fogetti 7y ago
But isn't that how valuation works works by definition? Why is this model of financing under scrutiny only now???? Blows my mind...
160.
by fogetti 7y ago
Well then maybe you should do the same thing first to set an example? Because what the OP describes is actually pretty much real. I would suggest you to check out Guy Standing and his research first.
161.
by fogetti 7y ago
> "They pump up valuations to get higher returns to look good to investors" says Eric Schiffer Seriously??? Who, even with half a brain could not understand that that's how venture capital works by definition???
162.
by fogetti 7y ago
You basically described what's wrong with caputalism in general. And I agree. Everybody shits their pants when there is a statue erected for the big leader but somehow noon really seems to care about the impact of big Corp to the same
163.
by fogetti 7y ago
You mean as childish as the ordinary YC investors? You are right about that then
164.
by fogetti 7y ago
It seems you imply there are imperfect managers but there can only ever be perfect developers. I would be the happiest person on this planet if that would be the case. Excellent communication skills don't help if the listener is sub-pa
165.
by fogetti 7y ago
Your message really needs context otherwise it's just a random rant. BTW no-one is deploying managers out of thin air. At least not in startups. What I can often see instead is that someone in the higher-ups needs OKRs, and he also wan
166.
by fogetti 7y ago
The problem is that priorities are still to be managed. And there is no such thing as 10 people decide one priority. It's always one person who decides the priority either by signing a contract, pushing a button, committing some code,
167.
by fogetti 7y ago
This is still a horrible idea. No IDE support, no debugging support, poor language choice. It's just simply screaming NO NO NO NO NO NO NO on every level of the framework. Not to mention that these days it is more important than ever t
168.
by fogetti 7y ago
Inherent architectural flaws: - Complete lack of separation of concerns: you can see this by the terrible idea of simply slapping a transformation procedure to a non-specified part of the codebase. Every time you do this you end up having t
169.
by fogetti 7y ago
While I appreciate the time put into the article this is all speculation. Reality is most companies simply look at the average industry salary and pick that number as an offer. If the candidate doesn't accept it、 companies simply look
170.
by fogetti 7y ago
I find it "funny" that the whole sharing and startup economy is basically built on top of something that resembles a Ponzi-scheme (not in terms of the actual operation of the scheme, but in the way how unfair the scheme is for dif
171.
by fogetti 7y ago
It's tangential to the discussion but I find it surprising and slightly upsetting the fact that people downvote someone who basically quotes the definition of a word as-it-is, verbatim. It happens quite often on hacker news. Are the fo
172.
by fogetti 7y ago
Thanks for the link. I haven't heard about this before but it seems really useful.
173.
by fogetti 7y ago
You can blame the person for being angry or you can blame yourself why you cannot face other people's negative emotions. I dont think that the solution exclusively lies with the angry person in this case.
174.
by fogetti 7y ago
This sounds like simple accusation and speculation without any proof to me.
175.
by fogetti 7y ago
"Good design is as little design as possible." - some German motherfucker
176.
by fogetti 7y ago
This doesn't make any sense. Just like you demoted the master's curriculum and all it's requirements to pass the classes on the way, you can say the same thing about the doctorate. You put in a few more years of minimal effor
177.
by fogetti 7y ago
I really don't know if it's open to the public or not but windguru definitely has the dataset that you described. You might want to contact them to figure it out :)
178.
by fogetti 7y ago
I haven't thought about step 3 before, but makes sense. Maybe I should show this to the guy who used Google Cloud Functions to upload images in our previous project :) I guess the reasoning would be that this way the actual time spent
179.
by fogetti 7y ago
So basically they are forcing the speaker to explain the same thing as they would have continued anyway, plus they even force the same speakers to fix the interrupters' mistakes in their thinking. Why is that good?
180.
by fogetti 7y ago
Your view is extremely simplistic and just doesn't reflect the sophistication of any abstract and complex conversation. Especially if the topic at hand is a new territory with a lot of unknown unknowns. If no-one ever explicitly says t

More ›