fogetti

35 ms·

271.
by fogetti 8y ago
It's very clear cut. The sentiment is the same. I don't know where you got it that it's not clear cut. The only thing which is not clear from your article is how will Abe and his corny friends shove their nuclear-friendly wor
272.
by fogetti 8y ago
Obviously there are many people on HN that consider that to be a good thing. I personally agree, this is the typical comment got. Only obviously blinded people wouldn't see this.
273.
by fogetti 8y ago
I also noticed this. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some editor-in-chief who basically scores the comments based on his taste.
274.
by fogetti 8y ago
False dichotomy. You are trying to make this black or white while there are many more options beside comments. There are even obvious ones beside comments.
275.
by fogetti 8y ago
Or maybe the original developer who wrote the code which was so poorly written that it needed 4 paragraphs of explanation did a shitty job . Period. They need to be told to go back and fix it. You see! You argument works both ways, yay!
276.
by fogetti 8y ago
You made a good point because this code is neither clean nor expressive. The parent comment talked about clean and expressive code. Can you show some of clean and expressive code and try to make the same argument again? (I am not holding my
277.
by fogetti 8y ago
Sure, and then the next day the whole thing is just a long boring text which has no correlation to reality because the business rule changed and the developer next to you refactored the code.
278.
by fogetti 8y ago
Can everyone claim that their terrible music is jazz music? Yes.
279.
by fogetti 8y ago
I would say that "Everyone is doing any language they want, design patterns they just read from a random article, 100s of tutorials on one subject" is far from being true anyway. That might be true if you live in a cave but when y
280.
by fogetti 8y ago
I find this specially troubling just like abandoning the Edge browser development. Steering away from Mongo just for the sole reason it's not in AWS sounds like a bad advice in general. Also it sounds like a false dichotomy. Implies th
281.
by fogetti 8y ago
You are implying that the causation goes like this: redux good -> so the app will be good too. And to make a case in point you are trying to make an argument that because many apps are poorly designed, everyone should use redux. You real
282.
by fogetti 8y ago
Github comment threads are basically like a kicked over dumpster which has all the content landed on the floor. I hate going over them. Something like a stackoverflow style organization would improve a lot.
283.
by fogetti 8y ago
Beg to differ, yes, implicit call order will result in huge clusterfucks. React+Redux is already causing Frankenstein apps (which is not implicitly caused by those frameworks (ok, maybe except redux) but when you throw in react-redux, react
284.
by fogetti 8y ago
It was clearly and prominently discussed in the article
285.
by fogetti 8y ago
Chrome is full of bugs and getting slower by each release. Also regarding how they force people to log in just to use profiles it's pretty clear that we need good alternatives.
286.
by fogetti 8y ago
At the same time Softbank's network was also down at the same time in Japan for the same Ericsson issue. The scale is quite surprising.
287.
NPM Announces 2019 Predictions for JavaScript(businesswire.com)
3 points by fogetti 8y ago|0 comments
288.
by fogetti 8y ago
I find this concept really remarkable and extraordinary. When I first encountered it I was still programming in Java and to my surprise there is an implementation of it in Java, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JCSP
289.
by fogetti 8y ago
You basically repeated what the OP said and making it look like it meant the opposite. Which it does not.
290.
by fogetti 8y ago
I am not convinced by this narrative. I would rather assume that like any ordinary project, Quora also was developed with zero security in mind. I would bet in a huge amount that noone has ever said during any project meeting that `BTW. I t
291.
by fogetti 8y ago
He is not aggressive at all. Upset? Maybe. Aggressive? No.
292.
by fogetti 8y ago
This is something I don't understand. How can it be illegal to expose vulnerability without telling someone the real issue in the digital world, while having no responsibility if let's say you call a shop owner's attention th
293.
by fogetti 8y ago
It's very relevant if the OP read the article or not. Makes his/her argument stronger/weaker because the articles are used as basis for the argument. So 'Did you even read the article?' is a valid question.
294.
by fogetti 8y ago
Well I did that in the startup I worked in previously. And no, they are not gonna call you for your shitty service. They are pretty stable. Guess what? We knew how to configure private clouds, loadbalancers, sharding and high availability.
295.
by fogetti 8y ago
Oh the irony... When someone's proposing that responsibilities should be allocated differently you are the biggest proponent of it unless someone's proposing that your responsibilities should be allocated somewhere else (like I pr
296.
by fogetti 8y ago
Here is what I see happening today: we have a bunch of hype inducted by cloud companies and their marketing departments around their solutions. Which makes their solutions look desirable and inevitable. Also makes them seem cutting-edge. We
297.
by fogetti 8y ago
If I read it right what you mean than probably we are on the same side. Yes, the problem you described is the exact problem I am trying to prevent in every organization that I join and I actively call out outdated development/managing
298.
by fogetti 8y ago
LOL. I worked in Nokia Networks for quite some time. > downtime is not an option HAHAHA - sure. Of course.
299.
by fogetti 8y ago
Nope. It is not. There you go. I gave a similarly strong argument to yours. Or did you really want to give arguments but you forgot it?
300.
by fogetti 8y ago
> while they're sleeping or if they get stuck on something, they should punt it over half-finished or half-broken to the infra eng By the description of it, the root cause of the problem is your setup. Dismantle the infra eng team

More ›