Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
fock
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
511.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
the amount of resources is very much constant, I don't see the earth adding mass anytime soon...
512.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
I think, the general idea is to make this very accessible. But obviously, there will be a price to pay: buy this Matebook - no Wifi, but hey you can get this very sweet, data-limited 5G plan for only USD50 a month. Get an unlimited plan for
513.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
well, except for the mentioned trades, they are all lifestyle businesses and luxury things. With 80% of the population not being able to afford this regularly (and being super price concious) and a large portion of the remaining 20% being c
514.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
so what kind of collecting device do you propose then?
515.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
*source: jobs where you are paid the minimum wage, but maybe you can cut that down a little by building a rent-seeking company. the only things which might remotely be well paid (trades/construction) generally have some relatively high
516.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
off-the-record (not written, not cited, but available in personal discussions).
517.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
I work in computational materials science (where ML brings funding) and a funny paper of this kind is here: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.11... - they are literally trying out 100
518.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx%27s_theory_of_alienation when reading the thing about people not related to their work anymore, I heard Marx.
519.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
nothing in "investigative reporting, commentary, criticism, and provocative personal essays" is, what I consider news. q.e.d. vox.com: "Vox explains the news.". No shroud of being objective here either. q.e.d. slate.com:
520.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
is CNN really putting up anything except news - of which reuters/AP/UPI already give a pretty good overview for free? And while all the left/neoliberal (and clickbaity) things you noted are free, they are less concerned with
521.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
for me as a self-declared european conservative (in the history of the social(isty)-centrist-catholic parties) this page gives hope that the USA, even if currently split in between wars of oil, race and money might still have the potential
522.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
and next year, chinese companies have that cheap Autodesk-compatible-software out there (like the online-office featured recently on HN) and everyone jumps there, because it's sooo cheeeeap. It seems like communist-painted authoritaris
523.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
wait, isn't the point of AGI that it reasons like a human? E.g. for a simple (SEO-plagued) query like "disassembly of consumer electronics X", I get actual, worthwhile content and not a 5min video-ad? Basically every mildly i
524.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
Given that we have AGI around the corner cough , building a model which discriminates SEO-spam from original content might be viable, don't you think so? Or for every new domain in the index you check whether it's legit or not by
525.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
0) the internet has made citing (and the expectations on knowing everything) so much easier. 1) China entered the game en force 2) everyone else has to step up 3) companies entered the market 4) in some areas, an arxiv (which is good) full
526.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
well, then this is the equivalent of computer hacking I guess and I better hope non of the adserving pages has an office in europe
527.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
> Modern instruments cost a lot of money, lots of labor to produce. well, I'm not sure, how the trumpet from 1970 differs from a modern instrument (and yeah, people are still using these, where I play), but yeah, "lot of money,
528.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
yes? if you want to have kids by 30, a PhD probably isn't right for you. A career in science might as well probably not work out. So what, not everyone needs to procreate?!
529.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
you missed two 0s for our postdocs annual net salary. But hey, generalization is so great. And while I understand that in most parts of the world, it's paid a lot worse and you might have problems making ends met, I don't really g
530.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
scrolling through the non-JS accessible adverts: it's like 80% of (probably VC-funded) startups offering some vision of "we are making the world a better place" for their usual, "crappy" (yes, they are also advertis
531.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
well, if museums would drive the same marketing campaigns (read propaganda or simply media based manipulation), this might easily change... Also generally the amount of time you can spend in museums is somehow limited, as most don't al
532.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
given that the bespoke companies (Inditex, H&M) are regularly selling off half their stock at 50% off and meanwhile looking into insolvency every few years, I think you overestimate their execution. Producing a shirt probably costs 40ct
533.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
most of the shirts I see on Amazon actually don't have a model (or are rendered already)
534.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
which does probably not really relate to AI. all the chinese amazon-sellers do it as well.
535.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
the cool thing about this solution seems also, that it conveniently alleviates the "need a screen"-problem of the windows-screencapture-approach.
536.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
or VPN on your router? or just get a VPS and run wireguard.
537.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
and today I was wondering how to solve the video problem! that's great timing.
538.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
with the non-bonded interactions parametrized with dimers it might work... sometimes (might be good enough for a lot of things though)
539.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
yes! if a thing of similar performance as GPT-3 could just spew out links to where its "inspiration" comes from, this would be (super expensive?) real context-aware search. This could be really great.
540.
▲
by
fock
6y ago
Why not pay them directly in a functioning economy, if its worth it? Why do you need to skim from random (!) other ventures to finance this kind of business? I'm also not sure, if I understand this correctly, but 32% (or 1 third ) see
More ›