fncndhdhc

6 ms·

1.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
I prefer to be judged on the content of my comments rather than the number of internet points displayed by my name. It allows for much more honesty and sincerity in discussions, and I think those are two qualities that HN could use more of
2.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
Bloomberg is trying to invent new, scarier sounding terminology, and honestly it's quite silly. What they're referring to are microbursts.
3.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
I skimmed the video because this is obviously very childish not really worth half an hour of my time. That being said, I did not see him perform any kind of rigorous numerical or theoretical analysis of the problem, which would be the first
4.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
Cringey youtube personality breaks some stuff on camera and claims to know more than teams of certified engineers.
5.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
And yet a Democratic Party IT administrator was shot and killed in DC two weeks ago. The media is trying to attribute it to a mugging, but no items were found taken off of his body. http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/lo
6.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
The article is about highly advanced anti-aircraft and anti-ship weapons. They don't even have armored infantry, let alone those.
7.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
If they were ill-equipped in Vietnam, ill-equipped in Iraq and Afghanistan, then why would potential combatants suddenly come into possession of weapon systems more expensive than their nation's GDP? World powers don't just hand
8.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
>It didn't stop Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iran/Iraq, or the two Persian Gulf wars from happening. So why do we need lasers, railguns, and stealth fighter jets to fight bands of rice farmers and goat herders?
9.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
The author seems to be forgetting that no two first-world, nuclear armed nations can ever engage eachother ever again without total mutual nuclear annihilation occuring. He spends the entire time worrying about highly advanced technologies
10.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
...until the interested business parties band together to form a government of sorts for their own benefit.
11.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
You're missing the point. If we magically enacted perfectly libertarian business policies overnight, business would immediately get to work creating new regulations because they're still self-interested like they were before. Th
12.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
More like Elon Musk points out by example why libertarianism is an oxymoron. As soon as all restrictions are lifted on businesses and a totally "free" market is created, business interests move to enact new regulations that entre
13.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
Quite typical for the mods to delete this. After all, wouldn't want word to get out that YC's political friends are crooks.
14.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
My guess would be that it was carried out by a different entity, i.e. some sub-faction of the campaign as opposed to occurring at the party level.
15.
by fncndhdhc 10y ago
>The public needed Russia (!) for a fresh dosis of unpopular truths Do people honestly believe that evidence of electoral fraud is some kind of Russian scheme? Those claims strike me as an attempt to deflect the issue by the increasingl